MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4416976183 · doi:10.1111/1467-9809.70039

VolkerLeppin: Francis of Assisi: The Life of a Restless Saint. Translated by Rhys S.BezzantNew Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2025; pp. 296.

2025· article· en· W4416976183 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Religious History · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensSt. Francis Xavier University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)SAINTGlossaryPoliticsFront (military)Index (typography)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Scholars who write about Francis of Assisi often want to share their love of this fascinating, and in many ways quite modern, saint. Volker Leppin's Francis of Assisi: The Life of a Restless Saint is well designed to do just that. The book is directed at a general audience, people who know of Francis, but want to explore his life more deeply. That audience is served well by several excursions explaining why decisions Francis made or things he said may look odd to our modern eyes but are more understandable when the medieval context is explained. A map at the front of the book and a chronology and comprehensive glossary at the back help orient the reader to the major events of Francis' life and many of the concepts that Leppin explores throughout his monograph. The Life of a Restless Saint presents Francis and his theology in his social, economic and political milieu in six chapters and a coda. Chapter 1 introduces the many and problematic sources that can be used to reconstruct Francis' life and suggests a useful method of reconciling them, arguing that the “tensions between the sources themselves … provide the most productive lines of inquiry” (p. 11). This methodology is put to good use in the following five chapters which flow chronologically from Francis' early life to his death in 1226. Chapter 2 discusses what we know of Francis' family, his early restlessness and desire to become a knight, contrasting it to Francis' conversion and early work in his newfound religious life. Chapter 3 explores how Francis initially “misunderstood” the meaning of the call to rebuild Christ's church, spending time literally building broken-down churches before drawing people to his way of life and receiving leave from Pope Innocent III for himself and his followers to live a life of apostolic poverty and mendicancy. This chapter also recounts the story of Clare's conversion to religious life. Chapter 4 begins to draw together a Franciscan theology from the disparate sources available that give insight into Francis' thoughts and puts that theology in tension with the increasing clericalization of the order. It ends with a discussion of the famous story of how Francis visited the Egyptian sultan al-Malik-al-Kamil. Chapter 5 examines Francis' orthodoxy with the structures of the medieval Catholic Church and the connections between the prelates of the growing Order and the papacy. Chapter 6 explores Francis' retreat from leadership and his move towards a life of contemplation, his growing illness and, finally his death in 1226. A short coda reminds readers that the fragments of Francis' lived experiences cannot possibly provide the story of the saint's whole life. One of the real delights of Leppin's biography is that he does not try to polish Francis into the expected image of a saint. He leaves that to hagiographers. Instead, he points to the moments in Francis' life where he seems disoriented and lost, when his mission was far from clear. These are also often places where the early hagiographies of Francis conflict. Focusing on these moments is fruitful for Leppin's analysis. To give only one example of many, while discussing Francis' missionizing trip to Egypt, Leppin offers a potential explanation for how Francis moved from the Crusader camp to have an audience with the sultan and then returned to the Crusader camp unharmed. He reminds his readers that Thomas of Celano's Vita prima notes that Francis was captured trying to sneak into the Muslim camp (p. 146). Once in front of the Sultan, accused of this infiltration, Francis took the opportunity to preach, and al-Malik-al-Kamil in turn took the opportunity to return “the ragged beggar [who] was no threat” to the Crusader camp, because “he didn't find Francis offensive enough to make him a martyr” (p. 147). This seems as likely as any other story of the exchange, perhaps more. Leppin's book was originally published in German (WBG, 2018) and was translated into English by Rhys Bezzant, a Senior Lecturer at Ridley College in Melbourne. Bezzant has translated Leppin's work before, which was surely helpful when translating this book that moves quickly through the many insights it presents about Francis. The translation is loose, which helps it read well in English, but at times, it is a bit too loose in ways that introduce errors into the text. In the sometimes technical discussion of which sources about Francis are most reliable, Bezzant introduces misconceptions as fact, for instance, the idea that we have an autograph of The Canticle of Brother Sun and Testament. “After all, in some writings—not least the already mentioned Canticle of Brother Sun— his own hand has been preserved” (p. 7). The same terminology is used to describe Francis' Testament: “we do at least have an extremely important text from his own hand relating to his autobiography” (p. 7). The German original only notes that Francis' own writings are fruitful for reconstructing Francis' inner life. “Besonders fruchtbar sind Franz’ eingene Schriften natürlich für eine Rekonstruktion seiner inneren Biographie, seiner Spiritualität.” It seems likely that Bezzant, as Leppin, meant only to imply that these texts were authored by Francis, and not truly autographs that survive to today, but when dealing with the Franciscan Question, it is best to be precise. Bezzant also includes far fewer citations in his translation, which makes his book more accessible but loses some of the original evidence and context found in the German. That The Life of a Restless Saint was written and translated by two more generalist scholars of Francis whose interest was in making his life more accessible is sometimes apparent. Why for instance, was the Legend of Perugia/Assisi Compilation, with its pericopes from close companions of Francis, not included in the discussion of reliable sources? There are important secondary sources missing: Chiara Frugoni's Francesco e l'invenzione delle stimmate (Giulio Einaldi, 1993), and Raoul Manselli's critical work on the Franciscan Question Nos qui cum eo fuminus: Contributo alla questione Francescana (Istituto Storico dei Cappuccini, 1980). Both works would have been immediately helpful to Leppin as he tackled both the Franciscan Question and the development of the story of Francis' stigmata. Similarly, Rosalind Brooke's work on the Legend of Perugia/Assisi Compilation, along with her later monograph The Image of St Francis (Cambridge UP, 2006) was not included, nor was Michael Robson's recent work on Francis and the early order. Additionally, Bezzant's choice to use Marion Habig's confusingly paginated and out-of-date Omnibus of the Sources for the Life of Francis (Franciscan Press, 1972), rather than the newer and more scholarly English translations found in Francis of Assisi: Early Documents (New City Press, 1999–2001) is perplexing. It is probably clear from the above that scholars of Francis may be a bit frustrated with this book, which seeks to simplify the very complicated source traditions of Francis' life into something that is easily digestible for a learned but not specialist audience in 300 pages. Yet, as a broad and engaging introduction to the baffling and fascinating contradictions of Saint Francis that seeks to make the saint more understandable to a 21st century audience, it does its job admirably. Even if it has some flaws as a work of textual criticism and history, Francis of Assisi: The Life of a Restless Saint is excellent in its thinking through Francis' theology and its meaning in Francis' own time and today.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,818
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,594

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,180 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle