Neural Oscillation Abnormalities and Abnormal Dynamic Network Connectivity in δ Frequency Band in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Based on Resting-State Electroencephalogram
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<bold>Objective</bold>Based on resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) data, analyze the abnormalities in neural oscillations within brain regions as well as the abnormal connectivity patterns of dynamic brain networks in the delta frequency band among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). <bold>Methods</bold> From November 2022 to May 2023, 41 elderly individuals were selected from Min'an Community, Qingyang District, Chengdu City, as the study subjects. Among them, 21 were in the MCI group, and 20 were in the healthy control group (control group). A 5-minute resting-state EEG data was collected from each participant using an EEG acquisition system. Analyze the power spectral density (PSD) of each electrode within the delta frequency band; Employ the directed transfer function (DTF) to construct resting-state dynamic causal brain networks, and concurrently analyze brain connectivity with statistically significant differences as well as their correlations with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores.<bold>Results</bold>(1) PSD: In the delta frequency band, the control group exhibited stronger delta oscillations at one electrode in the prefrontal lobe (F7), one electrode in the parietal lobe (CP6), and two electrodes in the occipital lobe (PO3, PO7) (P < 0.05). The MCI group showed stronger delta oscillations at seven electrodes in the prefrontal lobe (F8, FP2, AF3, Fz, FC1, FC2, FC5), eight electrodes in the parietal lobe (CP1, CP2, CP5, P3, P4, P7, P8, Pz), one electrode in the temporal lobe (T7), and two electrodes in the central region (C4, CZ) (P < 0.05).(2)Resting-state time-invariant dynamic networks: In the delta frequency band, the control group demonstrated significantly enhanced brain connectivity flowing from the prefrontal lobe (AF3) to the prefrontal lobe (AF4) (P < 0.05). The MCI group exhibited significantly enhanced top-down brain connectivity from the prefrontal lobe (FZ, F8) to the parietal lobe (P3), bottom-up brain connectivity from the parietal lobe (CP5) to the prefrontal lobe (FP2, F3), brain connectivity from the parietal lobe (P3) to the central region (C3) (P < 0.05), as well as bottom-up brain connectivity from the occipital lobe (PO3) to the prefrontal lobe (F7), the central region (C4), and the parietal lobe (CP5) (P < 0.05). In the resting state, the enhanced brain connections significantly correlated with the MOCA score include interactive brain connections between the prefrontal and parietal lobes (r = -0.37, P = 0.012; r = -0.41, P = 0.007), as well as bottom-up long-range connections from the occipital lobe to the central region and the parietal lobe (r = -0.34, P = 0.030; r = -0.37, P = 0.010).<bold>Conclusion</bold>MCI exhibited enhanced delta oscillations across multiple electrodes in various brain regions, predominantly distributed in the frontal and parietal lobes. In the delta frequency band, resting-state brain network connectivity showed significant abnormalities, primarily characterized by markedly enhanced mutual connectivity between the prefrontal and parietal lobes, as well as bottom-up brain connections from the occipital lobe to the central region and the parietal lobe.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».