Clicical Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Acupotomy Combined with Proprioceptive Training on Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<bold>Objective</bold>To investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided acupotomy combined with proprioceptive training in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).<bold>Methods</bold>A total of 80 KOA patients treated in the Rehabilitation Department of Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital from March to September 2023 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 40 cases in each group. Among them, the control group had 2 cases of dropout or termination due to patients being lost to follow-up during treatment, while the observation group had 1 case of dropout or termination due to patients being lost to follow-up during treatment. Ultimately, 38 and 39 cases were included in each group, respectively.The control group received ultrasound-guided needle knife therapy, 20 minutes per session, once daily, once weekly, lasting 4 weeks. The observation group received additional proprioceptive training, including passive and active repositioning training, BioDex balance training, and neuromuscular facilitation therapy for proprioception, with each training session lasting 10 minutes, once daily, five times weekly, for 4 consecutive weeks. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after treatment, knee function was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), synovial thickness of the affected knee joint was measured with an ultrasound detector, and static fall risk index (SFI), dynamic fall risk index (DFI), and postural stability limit (LOS) were assessed using the Biodex balance testing system.<bold>Results</bold>(1)VAS, WOMAC scores, and synovial thickness: Compared with pre-treatment, both groups showed significant reductions in VAS, WOMAC scores, and synovial thickness post-treatment (P<0.05). The observation group exhibited significantly lower VAS, WOMAC scores, and synovial thickness than the control group post-treatment (P<0.05). (2) SFI, DFI, and LOS scores: Compared with pre-treatment, the observation group demonstrated significant decreases in SFI, DFI, and LOS scores post-treatment (P<0.05), while the control group showed no statistically significant differences in these scores (P>0.05). The observation group exhibited significantly lower SFI, DFI, and LOS scores than the control group post-treatment (P<0.05). (3) Clinical efficacy: The observation group showed significantly higher clinical efficacy than the control group (U=460.0, P=0.004). (4) Safety: No adverse reactions such as wound infection or lidocaine allergy occurred during treatment in either group, and no adverse events like falls were reported in the observation group.<bold>Conclusion</bold>Ultrasound-guided needle knife combined with proprioceptive training can effectively alleviate pain, improve balance function and knee joint function in KOA patients, with good safety, making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».