The epidemiology and management of chronic osteomyelitis in pediatrics – A systematic review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: Infection leading to necrosis of any bone can lead to chronic osteomyelitis (CO), sometimes resulting in permanent orthopedic sequelae. There are no published guidelines on the optimal management of adult or pediatric CO The objective of this study was to analyze published evidence for the epidemiology and management of pediatric CO. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were studies of any design (minimum 2 patients) in any language that included patients with CO up to 17 years of age and described the epidemiology or management of CO. Ovid Medline(R) ALL, Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (via EBSCOhost) and Scopus were screened Jan 1, 1989 to Feb 13, 2025. Quality assessment was based on the degree of bias if one were to use that study to make decisions about management of CO. Studies were divided into those from middle-high and high-income countries versus studies from lower income countries. Data were extracted on demographics, biomarkers, pathogens, treatments offered, recurrences and orthopedic sequelae. RESULTS: There were 41 included studies - 26 from middle-high- and high-income countries (904 cases total) and 15 from lower income countries (975 cases total). All were observational and only 19 of the 41 studies reported 7 or 8 of the 8 items deemed essential to make decisions about management of CO. Definitions of CO varied markedly. Analyzing the 17 studies that included a minimum of 10 consecutive cases, 627 of 1073 cases (58%) occurred in males. In these 17 studies, the tibia or femur accounted for 630 of 934 cases (67%). In 212 of 287 cases (74%) with a single pathogen reported, that pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. There were no apparent differences in sex, bones involved or pathogens by country income level. Most cases (with the notable exception of those in recent case series from the United States) were managed with debridement. This was typically followed by sequential intravenous/per os (IV/ PO) antibiotics with almost no patients managed with PO antibiotics alone. Twelve case series reported use of local antibiotic delivery in addition to systemic antibiotics, but none of these studies had a control group. Studies were too heterogeneous in design to allow for data to be directly compared or combined. However, there was no obvious relationship between the route or duration of antimicrobials and the incidence of recurrences or orthopedic sequalae. CONCLUSION: There is a great need for high quality studies of all aspects of diagnosis and treatment of CO. Empiric coverage should target S. aureus. The evidence is poor quality, but there is no evidence that prolonged courses of antibiotics prevent recurrences.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,031 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,014 | 0,015 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».