MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417000878 · doi:10.26686/zq92-jhpj

France libre et Français libres dans les Établissements Français d’Océanie (1940-1947). Une histoire de la résistance des marges dans l’espace Pacifique

2025· dissertation· fr· W4417000878 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yacine Benhalima

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Languefr
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueNew Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismFrenchAutonomyPoliticsWorld War IINew Hebrides

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On 2 September 1940, the Établissements Français d’Océanie (EFO, currently known as French Polynesia) sided with General de Gaulle’s Free France movement. They became one of the very first French colonies to do so, alongside two other French Pacific colonies, the New Hebrides on 2 July 1940 and New Caledonia on 19 September 1940. A francophone stronghold in a mostly anglophone Pacific, the EFO maintained themselves within the Allies’ camp until the end of the Second World War. However, despite their early decision to rally to de Gaulle which made them pioneers within the external resistance, the EFO remain largely absent from Free France’s historiography. This thesis examines the EFO’s history during the Second World War and under Free France and discusses its connections with New Caledonia as well as with the regional powers in the Pacific (Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Japan). It defends two major ideas: that the EFO’s ralliement to Free France marks the starting point of the claims for and introduction of political autonomy in the territory, and that Free France’s actors and institutions in the EFO crystallised the colonial society that was then in place. The first chapter of this thesis begins by examining the definition of a Free French and how it does (or does not) apply to the Gaullist partisans in Tahiti. Based on recent works, it proposes a definition relying on four criteria: being a volunteer, enlisting between 18 June 1940 and 31 July 1943, recognizing General de Gaulle’s authority and acting outside of occupied France. The second chapter examines the EFO’s ralliement to Free France. It underlines that it was a local coup, led by local notable figures. While noting some external influences, this coup was led without any kind of external intervention and drawing on a favourable context where latent Anglophilia met a very specific colonial context. Metis businessmen and local administrators found themselves invested with a certain degree of agency which allowed them to act, severing their ties with the metropole and with the Vichy regime while forming new ones with the Allies. The third chapter proposes a political history of the wartime French Pacific, encompassing the EFO and New Caledonia. After the 1940 ralliements, the Free French headquarters felt that they needed people of confidence in the field. They then sent governor general Richard Brunot in an inspection mission; however, Brunot involved himself in the EFO’s affairs, proclaimed himself the colony’s governor and had the sitting governor Émile de Curton and several of his close collaborators jailed, under the false pretext of a Vichy plot against himself. De Gaulle then sent another representative, rear admiral Georges Thierry d’Argenlieu, whom he appointed High Commissioner in the Pacific. Upon arrival in Tahiti, d’Argenlieu had Brunot and de Curton recalled to London and appointed a new governor in Tahiti, lieutenant-colonel Georges Orselli. He then proceeded to Nouméa where he was, in turn, the cause for another grave political crisis by clashing with the governor Henri Sautot, before being himself recalled to London in late 1942. This chapter proposes the idea that both episodes are not separate crises as suggested by the historiography, but, on the contrary, the two phases of a single “Oceanian crisis”. The fourth chapter focuses on the military aspects of the topic. It underscores that the Free French in the Pacific conducted a war without battles, given that the EFO (and New Caledonia) were never attacked by neither the Japanese, the Germans or the Vichy regime. This absence of enemy attack or intervention was a relief for local authorities as the local troops were largely insufficient to repel them. However, the creation of local militias by the colonial authorities and the arrival of large American forces in early 1942, in both New Caledonia and the island of Bora Bora, balanced the situation . Chapter five elaborates on the EFO’s diplomatic and commercial activities during the war. Given the absence of active combat on its soil, the colony was able to focus on developing its relations with the UK, the USA, Australia and New Zealand. It supports the idea of Tahiti as an important diplomatic centre, welcoming consuls and representatives from the UK (the British consulate in Papeete working since 1837), New Zealand and the USA, among others. It also underscores the successful diplomatic campaign led by High Commissioner d’Argenlieu thanks to which Australia and New Zealand broke diplomatic relations with Vichy and agreed to deal only with Free France, even though both countries had supported the Gaullist regime in the Pacific as early as late 1940. It also brings to light the EFO’s commercial health: the colony was able to export vanilla, mother-of-pearl, copra and phosphates to the Allies and to receive in return some very appreciable cash income. The sixth and last chapter focuses on the “sortie de guerre” (literally “war exit”), from the Brazzaville conference in January 1944 to the Ville d’Amiens affair in June 1947, during which Free French veterans led a protest in Papeete to prevent three civil servants coming from France from disembarking, arguing that their positions could have been assumed by Polynesians. It addresses the repatriation in May 1946 of the volunteers who had gone to fight overseas and their return to civilian life. Finally, it engages with how Free France and the Free French have been celebrated, awarded, and commemorated since the end of the war.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,322
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,004
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetNew Caledonia Indigenous StudiesTravaux en français237 207