MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417001993 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1092

Humanistic and economic burden among caregivers of adults and children with sickle cell disease and recurrent vaso-occlusive crises

2025· article· en· W4417001993 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. Lilly, Duncan Brown, Nanxin Li, Melanie Calvert, Anthony Mason, Laurice Levine, Neelam Dongha, Zahra Pakbaz, Farrukh Shah, Ashley Valentine, María Aragón, Bethany Franks, Idaira Rodríguez Santana

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiseaseQuality of life (healthcare)Activities of daily livingBlood DisorderDisease burdenMental healthCaregiver burdenHealth care

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic, inherited blood disorder characterized by recurrent pain episodes, frequent hospitalizations, and multi-system complications. While the patient burden of SCD is well-documented, there is limited evidence describing the experiences of those providing informal care for patients with SCD. Caregivers of patients with SCD, particularly of those experiencing multiple vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), play a crucial role, frequently supporting medical, emotional, and daily living needs over many years. This role can exact a considerable toll on caregivers' physical and mental health, financial stability, and quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the humanistic and economic impact of caregiving for patients living with SCD and recurrent VOCs across North America and Europe. Methods: A quantitative online survey collected self-reported demographic, clinical, and health-related quality of life data from caregivers of patients with SCD and recurrent VOCs living in the US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands. The survey included the CarerQOL-7D and CarerQOL-VAS; the Zarit Burden Interview short form (ZBI-12); the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire; and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and EQ-5D VAS. Caregiver characteristics, out-of-pocket expenses, and health inequity experiences were also evaluated. Participants were required to provide consent and meet the eligibility criteria of ≥18 years of age and caring for a patient with a SCD diagnosis experiencing ≥2 VOCs/year for the last two years that required interaction with a medical facility and pain medication or red blood cell transfusion. Descriptive analyses were conducted for caregiver-reported data and validated measures. Results across North America and Europe were pooled for reporting. Monetary values were standardized to U.S. dollars (USD) using contemporaneous exchange rates. Results: The survey was completed by 173 caregivers from North America (53.8%) and Europe (46.2%). Caregivers were predominately female (76.9%), married or living with a domestic partner (47.4%), with an average age of 40.5 (SD: 11.1) years. Most were employed (66.5%) with 53.8% working full-time. Caregivers had been providing care for an average of 12.4 (SD: 7.8) years, most commonly for a child or dependent young adult (mean patient age: 23.5 (SD: 15.0) years), with an average of 5.1 (SD: 3.2) VOCs in the past year and considerable clinical complications. CarerQOL-7D (mean 68.2; SD: 21.2) (0-100 scale; 100=best QOL) and CarerQOL-VAS (6.5; SD: 1.9) (0-10 scale; 10=best QOL) scores, along with the ZBI-12 burden score (17.0; SD: 8.6) (0-48 scale; 48=the most burden), indicate substantial quality of life impacts due to caregiver burden. EQ-5D-5L index (0.84; SD: 0.18) (0-1 scale; 1 = best QOL) and VAS (75.5; SD: 16.6) (0-100 scale; 100=best QOL) suggest moderate health status impacts. Among employed caregivers, WPAI outcomes indicated substantial work impacts: 20% (SD: 24%) absenteeism, 41% (SD: 29%) presenteeism, and 49% (SD: 30%) overall work impairment. On average, caregivers reported spending approximately 46 hours weekly on caregiving activities for the patient. Most caregivers (63.6%) reported distress due to financial burden and incurred out-of-pocket costs totaling $8,652 annually (US: $13,306; ex-US: $4,052) for caregiver-related expenses while the median annual income was just $36,600 (IQR: $22,000-$51,190). Frequent healthcare encounters amplified caregiver exposure to systemic challenges in the healthcare system. In the past year, patients averaged 5.0 (SD: 4.2) emergency department visits, 4.0 (SD: 4.5) hospitalizations, and 25.9 (SD: 38.1) inpatient days. Three-quarters of caregivers (74.0%) reported advocating for the patient to get needed care some or all of the time, with 46.8% reporting stigma related to pain medication requests. Conclusion: Caregivers of patients with SCD and recurrent VOCs experience a substantial impact on their health, quality of life, and productivity. These findings highlight the urgent need for tailored support systems, financial assistance, and healthcare policies that recognize and address the distinct challenges faced by caregivers of patients with SCD and recurrent VOCs. Moreover, future initiatives aimed at improving access to emerging therapies may help ease the substantial burden experienced by caregivers.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207