Sensitive peripheral residual disease (PRD) detection using clonotypic mass spectrometry (EasyM) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negative status has been associated with favourable outcomes confirming its utility as a reliable surrogate marker for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The current methods include next generation sequencing (NGS) or next generation flow cytometry (NGF) but these rely on serial, invasive bone marrow (BM) assessments, which is often limited by heterogeneously patchy disease and suboptimal sampling. EasyM (Rapid Novor) is a peripheral blood based clonotypic mass spectrometry assay that employs de novo sequencing of the serum M-protein to identify a 'patient-specific peptide fingerprint’ allowing for the quantitative tracking of peripheral residual disease (PRD) (Liyasova 2021). In this study, we prospectively aimed to evaluate the clinical applicability of PRD assessments by EasyM. Methods: This is a prospective, multi-center, investigator-initiated study in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The study enrols both transplant eligible (TE) and transplant ineligible (TI) NDMM patients within 4 months of treatment initiation; with screening M protein of >2g/L and/or involved free light chains (iFLC) of >200mg/L. Conventional myeloma tests are done monthly. EasyM is performed at screening (visit (v)1), and q3 months (v2+) for TI patients; and post-induction (v2), at day100 post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT; v3) and q3 monthly (v4+) thereafter for TE patients. BM MRD assessment by NGF (sensitivity 10-5) was performed once patients had negative PRD assessment by EasyM. The primary objective is to prospectively compare conventional myeloma assessments, PRD by EasyM and BM MRD by NGF to establish the role of EasyM in clinical practice. Results: As of July 25, 2025, 55 patients have been pre-screened with successful identification of unique clonotypic peptide in 54 patients- one patient was a screen failure due to iFLC levels below the detection threshold. The median age was 61 (range 33-77) years and 53% (n=29) were males. Among 48 patients with measurable intact paraprotein, the median M concentration at screening was 15.35 (range 1.1-68.1) g/L; isotypes included IgG in 74% (n=41) and IgA in 13% (n=7). In 7 patients with light chain (LC) myeloma (13%; kappa=3; lambda=4), median iFLC was 2616 (range 22.9-9381) mg/L; one LCMM was had iFLC below thresshold so excuded from the study. All 54 patients meeting eligibility criteria had successful baseline identification of clonotypic peptide, including 2 patients with M-protein < 2g/L and 6 evaluable patients with LC MM. Thirty-seven (68%) patients were TE. At the time of analysis, 23 (43%) had completed ASCT (19 single, 4 tandem) and 14 (26%) patients had started induction with the intent to proceed to ASCT. Four patients had received induction therapy followed by T cell redirecting therapy. Eight patients (9%) were TI, and 5 patients were yet to start myeloma treatment. At a median follow up of 5.6 (range 1-14) months, 30, 21 and 8 patients had completed the 2nd, 3rd and 4th visit assessments, respectively. At v2, 83% (25/30) had achieved ≥VGPR, with 11 SPEP (-), 2 SIFE (-) and no PRD (-) by EasyM. At v3, 90% (19/21) were in ≥VGPR with 9 SPEP (-), 7 SIFE (-) and 3 PRD (-) by EasyM highlighting that PRD could still detect M protein in 4 SIFE (-)patients. Amongst the patients with matched BM MRD assessments (n=9) performed within 30 days of PRD testing, six revealed concordances between BM MRD by NGF and PRD by EasyM: 4 were negative and 2 were positive by both methods. All but one of the patients demonstrating MRD (-) and PRD (-) remained SIFE (+), demonstrating an IgG kappa likely due to prior daratumumab exposure. Notably, 3 patients showed discordance between MRD and PRD assessments, with negativity by BM MRD post 4 cycles of induction yet remained SIFE (+) and PRD (+), likely reflecting delayed clearance of M-protein due to its longer half-life. All three patients had an IgG paraprotein and follow up PRD assessments are pending. To date, one TI patient has shown biochemical progression evidenced rising EasyM and iFLC levels. Conclusion: This ongoing study explores the utility of longitudinal PRD monitoring using clonotypic mass spectrometry (EasyM) which is a sensitive, non-invasive serum-based method for reliably detecting PRD and predicting BM MRD status. Updated results with longer follow up data will be presented.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».