MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417004100 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3066

Management of breakthrough bleeds in participants with hemophilia Α or Β without inhibitors receiving marstacimab prophylaxis in the phase 3 BASIS study

2025· article· en· W4417004100 sur OpenAlexaff
Davide Matino, Hae‐Kyung Kim, Carrie Turich Taylor, Pengling Sun, Travis J. Gould, Andrew Palladino

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBleedConcomitantObservational studyBreakthrough bleedingPhases of clinical researchAdverse effectClinical trialHemarthrosis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Marstacimab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the tissue factor pathway inhibitor to rebalance hemostasis. It is approved for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) without inhibitors. The pivotal phase 3 BASIS study (NCT03938792) demonstrated marstacimab was effective in reducing treated bleeds vs prior on-demand (OD) or routine prophylaxis (RP) therapy in participants (pts) with severe HA (FVIII <1%) or moderately severe to severe HB (FIX ≤2%) without inhibitors. We aimed to assess the management of breakthrough bleeding episodes in pts who received concomitant factor replacement therapy (FRT) and weekly (QW) marstacimab in BASIS. Methods BASIS enrolled male pts aged ≥12 to <75 years. Results are reported for the noninhibitor cohort. Pts entered a 6-month observational phase (OP) and received prescribed FRT (OD or RP) before entering the 12-month active treatment phase (ATP) to receive a single dose of 300 mg marstacimab (2×150 mg subcutaneous [SC]) followed by 150 mg SC QW. To manage breakthrough bleeds, pts could take their prescribed FRT at the lowest effective dose, determined by each investigator per the approved product label. FRT dose, date, and time of infusions and FRT product were recorded in an electronic diary; the type of product (plasma-derived [pd], recombinant standard half-life [SHL], or recombinant extended half-life [EHL]) was determined. An acute treated bleed was defined as a bleeding event treated with episodic FRT within 48 hours of the bleed starting. Results Of 128 pts (HA: n=101; 78.9%; HB: n=27; 21.1%) who entered the OP, 116 received marstacimab prophylaxis in the 12-month ATP. At baseline, median age was 30.0 (range 13-66) years, and most were White (50.8%) or Asian (47.7%); 36 (97.3%) and 53 (58.2%) pts in the OD and RP groups, respectively, had ≥1 target joint. The median (range) marstacimab treatment duration was 12.1 months for both the OD (11.5-13.1 months) and RP (0.9-12.8 months) groups. In all, 75 (64.6%) pts experienced 453 acute bleeding events in the ATP, which were treated with 555 FRT infusions (OD: 125; RP: 430). Most acute breakthrough bleeds (OD: 83.7%; RP: 83.1%) were treated with a single infusion of FRT; 18.3% and 12.3% of bleeds in the OD and RP group, respectively, were treated with 2 infusions; in the RP group, 2.9% of bleeds were treated with 3 infusions and 1.7% of bleeds were treated with ≥4 infusions (5/6 were spontaneous joint bleeds). For both OD and RP pts with HA or HB, the most frequently used FRT to treat acute breakthrough bleeds was pd or SHL product; 401/453 (88.5%) bleeds were treated with pd or SHL product (HA: 351/375 [93.6%]; HB: 50/78 [64.1%] bleeds). For OD pts with HA during ATP, the mean (SD) pd/SHL FVIII dose/infusion was 24.19 (7.98) IU/kg (n=19) (OP: 21.63 [10.72] IU/kg [n=26]) and mean (SD) EHL FVIII dose/infusion was 19.93 (5.67) IU/kg (n=4) (OP: 16.46 [5.05] IU/kg [n=8]). For RP pts with HA during ATP, the mean (SD) pd/SHL FVIII dose/infusion was 24.61 (8.09) IU/kg (n=40) (OP: 28.06 [8.83] IU/kg [n=37]) and mean (SD) EHL FVIII dose/infusion was 30.57 (9.83) IU/kg (n=4) (OP: 43.44 [8.59] IU/kg [n=5]). In all OD and RP pts with HA, 80.4% and 82.4% of acute bleeds were treated with a single infusion of FRT, respectively. For OD pts with HB during ATP, the mean (SD) pd/SHL FIX dose/infusion was 23.70 (7.15) IU/kg (n=3) (OP: 23.76 [10.77] IU/kg [n=5]) and mean (SD) EHL FIX dose/infusion was 12.60 (5.06) IU/kg (n=2) (OP: 13.16 [5.65] IU/kg [n=4]). For RP pts with HB during ATP, the mean (SD) pd/SHL FIX dose/infusion was 49.51 (26.40) IU/kg (n=5) (OP: 47.28 [17.10] IU/kg [n=6]) and mean (SD) EHL FIX dose/infusion was 47.04 (11.53) IU/kg (n=6) (OP: 74.36 [21.47] IU/kg [n=4]). In OD and RP pts with HB, 100.0% and 85.7% of acute bleeds were treated with a single infusion of FRT, respectively. For RP pts with HB, FIX consumption was influenced by 2 marstacimab-treated adolescents with several traumatic bleeds that required FRT. No thromboembolic events were reported in association with concomitant FRT use. Conclusions In the BASIS study, for pts with HA or HB without inhibitors, acute breakthrough bleeding episodes were successfully managed with episodic FRT during concurrent QW marstacimab prophylaxis and marstacimab was generally safe. Most acute breakthrough bleeds were managed with a single infusion of FRT, and the most common treatment agents were SHL FVIII products (recombinant or pd).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,318 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→