MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417004910 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1031

Evidence for pre-existing myeloma cells with a gene expression pattern associated with resistance to BCMA CAR T cells.

2025· article· en· W4417004910 sur OpenAlexaff
Angélica M. Amanso, Karanpreet Singh Bhatia, Mackenzie Mekler, James Ackley, Pankoj Kumar Das, London Harper, Holly Lee, Madhav V. Dhodapkar, Stanley R. Riddell, Paola Neri, Nizar J. Bahlis, Sagar Lonial, Adam Marcus, Lawrence Boise

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCD19Cell cultureMultiple myelomaGene expressionAntigenAnnexin A5GeneChimeric antigen receptor

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Targeting BCMA has shown promising activity in multiple myeloma (MM). However, durability of responses has been somewhat disappointing. To determine potential mechanisms of resistance to BCMA CAR T cells, we applied Spatiotemporal Genomic Analysis (SaGA) to isolate myeloma cells that are engaged by a CAR T cell but not killed in culture and performed RNAseq on the isolated cells. Methods: To perform SAGA, Dendra2 was introduced into myeloma cell lines (KMS12PE, KMS18, KMS26, KMS27 and RPMI8226). Cells were cultured with BCMA- or CD19-CAR T cells (1:1) and live imaged for up to 20 h. Killing was measure by Annexin V staining. Cells that were engaged for 16 hours and alive, were photoconverted and sorted for RNAseq. Differentially expressed genes were compared to untreated cells. Gene sets from these data as well as from differentially expressed genes on day 28 post CAR T infusion (Dhodapkar, BCD, 2022) were then used to find pre-treatment cells, indicating pre-existing cells with a resistant gene signature. Results: Initial studies demonstrated that the average time of engagement that led to cell death in the 5 cell lines ranged from 5.48-9.42 h. However, in each line a proportion of cells survived until the end of the incubation (mean 24.7%, range 3.8-42.9%) and the average engagement of these cells was significantly longer in 4/5 cell lines, suggesting this was not lack of engagement but lack of killing. To assure this was due to antigen specific engagement, we repeated the experiment with CD19 CAR T cells in KMS18 and KMS12PE and the total time of engagement of live cells was reduced from 12.49 and 14.63 h to 5.39 and 2.74 h respectively. Importantly with BCMA CAR T the average and total time of engagement was nearly identical for all cells, indicating that once engaged, the T cell did not disengage. In contrast for CD19 CAR T the average time of engagement was less than 30 min, suggesting the interactions were transient. To determine if engagement time could be influenced by resistance, we created KMS18 cells that lacked CD95 and over-expressed the Granzyme B inhibitor Serpin B9. When exposed to BCMA CAR T, the viability at the end of 16 hours increased from 28.8% to 88.3%. This was associated with an increase in the proportion of cells engaged for 16 hours (53.3% vs. 83.0%). We then performed 4 independent isolations of photoconverted cells from KMS12PE and KMS26 cells for RNAseq analysis. We confirmed there was no T cell contamination. We determined that in KMS12PE and KMS26 there were 1101 commonly upregulated genes (padj<0.01 and FC>2) and top gene ontology hits included “integrin signaling” “WNT signaling” and “Inflammation by chemokine and cytokine signaling.” The latter was driven by upregulation of IFNγ-responsive genes (e.g., CXCL10, GBP1, GBP2, GBP4, IL6). Expression of IFNg receptors was confirmed by flow cytometry and IFNginduction of genes validated by qPCR and/or flow cytometry. There were only 3 commonly down regulated genes and only 1 coding. This was due to the low number of significantly down-regulated genes in KMS26, therefore we focused on KMS12PE. The down-regulated genes were associated with cell death (e.g., TNFRSF10B, PMAIP1, BBC3) and unfolded protein response (e.g., ERN1, ATF4, DDIT3). Downregulation of these genes was previously reported in residual cells 28 days following BCMA CAR T infusion (Dhodapkar, BCD, 2022) and during in vitro selection of cells resistant to BCMA T cell engagers (Lee, ASH, 2024). In these studies the selection time was 4 weeks, in this present study it was 16 h, suggesting these cells were pre-existing. To determine if similar cells existed in patients pre-CAR T infusion, we re-analyzed the scRNAseq comparing Days 0 and 28 post-infusion cells, determined the top 100 down-regulated genes and if there were cells at day 0 where gene expression correlated (>0.8). We found that a subset of Day 0 cells in each patient had a day 28-like expression pattern. We performed a similar analysis using the top 100 down-regulated genes from the resistant KMS12PE (correlation >0.85) and the findings reflected the day 28 signature.Conclusions: These data indicate that MM cells that are resistant to BCMA-targeted therapies are likely to be pre-existing in patients and have a gene expression pattern associated with decreased UPR and cell death signaling. These cells can be detected by single cell analysis and could be used to inform treatment decisions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,334
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→