Splenectomy as a treatment for relapsed or refractory immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A systematic review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (iTTP) is a rare, life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy caused by acquired ADAMTS13 protein deficiency. First-line therapy consists of plasma exchange (PLEX) and, more recently, adjuncts such as rituximab and caplacizumab. Despite these advancements in therapy, 10-20% of patients experience relapsed/refractory disease, and adjunctive therapies may be inaccessible in resource-limited settings. Numerous cohort studies and case series have investigated the efficacy and safety of splenectomy in refractory and relapsing iTTP; however, as stated in the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) 2025 TTP guidelines, splenectomy as a prophylactic/treatment strategy has not been systematically reviewed to date. Objective: We completed a systematic review assessing the safety and efficacy of splenectomy for relapsed/refractory iTTP. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 2025, and the American Society of Hematology and ISTH conference abstracts published since 2014. Studies were included if they enrolled adults with iTTP who relapsed or were refractory to PLEX as per study definition, underwent splenectomy, and reported remission rate as an outcome. Non-English studies and case reports with fewer than five patients were excluded. Studies were screened at title/abstract and full-text levels, and data were extracted independently and in duplicate. Baseline characteristics, relevant disease definitions, prior therapies, and operative details were extracted. Primary efficacy outcomes included remission and relapse/exacerbation rate as defined by the International Working Group or by study authors. Secondary outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, surgical mortality, and surgical complication rate. Given expected heterogeneity in data, inferential analysis was deferred. The study protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO: CRD42024612298. Results: We identified 1781 studies, of which 91 were reviewed at full-text level, and 18 were ultimately included (n=171 patients): 1 prospective cohort study, 4 retrospective cohort studies, and 13 case series with a median follow-up of 30.8 months (IQR: 17.3 - 45.0). Studies were published between 1983 to 2020, with sample sizes ranging from 5 to 33 patients. From the total patient population, 132 (77%) were female with a median age of 42 years (IQR: 36.5 - 46.6). All patients received PLEX prior to splenectomy, often alongside corticosteroids, dextran, vincristine, and oral antiplatelet therapies. Rituximab was given to 10 patients in two studies published in 2012 and 2020, and no patients received caplacizumab. Splenectomy was performed on patients with an open (54%) and laparoscopic (46%) technique, but the surgical approach of splenectomy was only reported in 33% of studies. Definitions for relapse, remission, and response were highly variable. Per study definitions, 129 (75%) patients achieved long-term remission with splenectomy, and 29 (16.9%) had TTP relapse after splenectomy. Nineteen patients (11.1%) died at 90 days; 6 deaths (3.5%) were related to surgical complications, including infection. Other post-operative complications were reported in 11 of 18 studies involving a total of 21 patients. The most frequently reported events included infection, hematoma, and pulmonary embolism; less common complications were pancreatic injury, fistula, and fluid collections. Conclusion: Splenectomy leads to a high rate of iTTP remission and is associated with low mortality, suggesting that it may be a reasonable therapeutic option in resource-limited settings where other adjunctive therapies such as rituximab and caplacizumab are inaccessible. Conclusions are limited by heterogeneity with respect to disease and response definitions, and high risk of publication bias.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».