MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417006327 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-4337

Comprehensive and rapid detection of genomic alterations in pediatric leukemias using whole-genome sequencing with adaptive sampling

2025· article· en· W4417006327 sur OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Geoffrion, Charlène Lawruk‐Desjardins, Sylvie Langlois, Niklas Dreyer, Véronique Lisi, Chantal Richer, Alex Saint-Hilaire, Pascal Tremblay-Dauphinais, Banafsheh Khakipoor, Sandy Fong, Adam Shlien, Sonia Cellot, Thai Hoa Tran, Daniel Sinnett, Vincent‐Philippe Lavallée

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick ChildrenCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de MontréalOntario Genomics
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExome sequencingGenomic sequencingDNA sequencingNanopore sequencingGenomicsExomeSampling (signal processing)Workflow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Molecular and cytogenetic classification is essential for risk stratification and therapeutic decisions in pediatric leukemias. Conventional workflows typically require multiple tests, some offering rapid but focused insights (e.g., FISH), others providing broad information at the cost of longer turnaround times (e.g., karyotyping, exome, RNA-seq). This iterative and fragmented approach increases costs, delays decisions, and consumes limited tumor material. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) captures both genomic and epigenomic information, interpretable in real time. However, the coverage of a single flow cell (<40X) limits sensitivity for subclonal events. ONT supports Adaptive Sampling (AS-WGS), which selectively enriches regions of interest to increase coverage, but workflows are still being optimized. We hypothesized that optimized AS-WGS could provide high coverage sufficient to detect subclonal alterations while retaining pan-genomic breadth, enabling the identification of all relevant genomic events in a single test to support rapid classification of pediatric leukemias. We applied an optimized AS-WGS protocol to 31 samples from 30 pediatric patients enrolled in the Signature research program. The cohort included 20 leukemia/MDS cases (8 B-ALL, 7 AML, 3 T-ALL, 1 Burkitt leukemia, 1 MDS), and 11 controls (7 solid tumors and 4 normal tissues). Genomic DNA was sheared (~12 kb) and sequenced using ONT SQK-LSK114 on FLO-PRO1114M flow cells, with adaptive sampling of a custom list of 380 genes/loci. Sequencing ran for 72 hours. Performance was benchmarked against alterations identified by extensive clinical testing (FISH, karyotyping, microarrays, exome and RNA-seq). Mutations with VAF >5% from clinical exomes were considered; alterations not called by the workflow were included if supported by ≥5 reads. We developed an open-source pipeline, Oncoseq, using nf-core standards to streamline data analysis (github.com/chusj-pigu/nf-core-oncoseq). Across 31 samples, AS-WGS achieved a mean on-target coverage of 160X (range: 55–251) and genome-wide coverage of 17X (range: 9–25). Performance was influenced by DNA quality (DIN <8.0) and flow cell characteristics. Among leukemias (n=20), all clinical somatic mutations (47/47, 100%) were detected, including low-VAF (≥5%) variants and large indels such as FLT3 and UBTF internal tandem duplications. VAFs correlated strongly with clinical exome data (r = 0.905). Sixteen of 17 gene fusions (94%) were confidently identified, supported by a mean of 56 reads (range: 24–112). The remaining fusion was supported by only one read, which was attributable to lower quality (DIN 6.9) and tumor purity. AS-WGS detected challenging fusions, such as DUX4::IGH and cytogenetically cryptic NUP98::NSD1. All copy-number variants (CNVs) were accurately identified in 11 of 12 samples, including key alterations like hyperdiploidy. The one missed event was an interstitial chromosome 12 deletion in <25% of cells, at the limit of microarray detection threshold; it was retrospectively visible in AS-WGS data. Focal deletions in CDKN2A/B (n=6), IKZF1 (n=2), and PAX5 (n=1) were all reliably detected. We next assessed detection timing retrospectively using read timestamps. All large CNVs were detectable within the first hour of sequencing. All clonal mutations (VAF >25%) and all detectable fusions reached confident support (≥10 reads) within 28 hours of sequencing, with median 10-reads detection times of 4.2 and 7.4 hours, respectively. AS-WGS signal from PCR-free libraries also supports methylation calling. Using the Marlin classifier (github.com/hovestadt/MARLIN), 7 of 8 B-ALL samples were correctly classified into molecular subgroups: hyperdiploidy, ETV6::RUNX1, Ph+/Ph-like, DUX4-r, PAX5-r, ZNF384-r, and TCF3::PBX1. Notably, classification was confidently achieved within the first 10 minutes of sequencing, before fusion detection. In summary, AS-WGS enables, in a single test, detection of nearly all clinically relevant alterations in pediatric leukemias, including structural variants and mutations, while also supporting methylation-based classification. Optimized protocols and bioinformatics workflows identify most clonal alterations within the first day, with interpretable findings emerging within the first hour. This strategy holds strong potential to transform time-sensitive clinical decision-making and is currently undergoing prospective validation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207