MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417008388 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-884

Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive (TN) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): Results from the Phase 2 TrAVeRse study

2025· article· en· W4417008388 sur OpenAlexaff
Eliza A. Hawkes, Joanna Romejko‐Jarosińska, Wojciech Jurczak, Sunil Iyengar, Abel Costa, Nimish Shah, Monique Menzies Wojtowicz, Allison Winter, Adam Witkowski, Neil Chua, Ana Jiménez Ubieto, John Kuruvilla, Diego Villa, Chan Y. Cheah, André Goy, Elise A. Chong, Andrew Wood, Rachel Fletcher, Stefanie Meyer, Rebecca Silva, Simon Rule, Michael Wang

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensSpinal Cord Injury BCPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer AgencyOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChemoimmunotherapyMantle cell lymphomaRituximabPhases of clinical researchProgressive diseaseClinical endpointMinimal residual diseaseLymphomaIbrutinib

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: MCL is a rare B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma typically treated with first-line (1L) chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). While Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are approved in CIT combinations in TN MCL, novel 1L chemotherapy-free BTKi combinations are of interest. The phase 1b ACE-LY-106 study supported development of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in patients (pts) with TN MCL (Wang et al. Blood Adv. 2024;8:4539-48). We report preliminary AVR efficacy and safety in TN MCL in the ongoing, open-label, phase 2 TrAVeRse study (NCT05951959). Methods: Pts were aged ≥18 y with TN MCL requiring treatment (tx), radiologically measurable disease, sufficient tissue for baseline clone detection for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing (clonoSEQ), and ECOG PS 0‒2 (or 3 if due to MCL). Pts received AVR induction (1 cycle [C] = 28 d): A (100 mg BID, C1‒C13 [+ C14 post induction]), V (C2‒C13, escalating during C2 [20 mg up to 400 mg daily]), and R (375 mg/m2 on day [D] 1 of C1‒12). Primary endpoint was MRD-negative (MRD-neg) complete response (CR) rate (MRD-neg in peripheral blood by next-generation sequencing [10-5; clonoSEQ], CR by 2014 Lugano criteria) at end of AVR induction (C13). Pts with MRD-neg CR at end of C13 were randomized 1:1 at C15D1 to continued A monotherapy until progressive disease (PD) or observation until PD with the option to restart A at relapse. Results: In total, 108 pts were enrolled and treated in 7 countries (January–July 2024). Median age was 69 y (range 40–89) with 74.1% male and 87.0% White. Stage IV disease (90.7%), extranodal disease (93.5%), and marrow involvement (84.3%) were common. TP53 was mutated (TP53m) in 19.1% of pts (17/89 with available TP53), 30.6% had high-risk simplified MIPI score, 8.3% had blastoid/pleomorphic histology, and 38.0% had Ki-67 ≥30%. At data cutoff (DCO; March 31, 2025 [14 mo after 1st pt treated]), response assessments were completed by 106 (98.1%) pts at C4D1, 100 (92.6%) at C7D1, 93 (86.1%) at C10D1, and 12 (11.1%) at C14D1 (end of AVR induction). Median follow-up was 10.5 mo (range 1–14); 102 (94.4%) pts remained on study, and 93 (86.1%) remained on tx. Median tx duration was 10.1 mo (range 1‒14). Fifteen pts (13.9%) discontinued ≥1 study drug; 11 (10.4%) discontinued all txs (AE, n=5; PD, n=4; pt decision, n=1; investigator decision, n=1). Four pts died (PD, n=3; AE, n=1). At DCO, all 12 pts who had completed end of AVR induction response assessments achieved MRD-neg CR per Lugano criteria (primary endpoint). At time of DCO (most pts still on AVR induction), overall response rate was 95.4% (103/108); CR rates were 53.7% (58/108 per Lugano) and 63.0% (68/108 per PET-CT). Overall, 95.4% (103/108) achieved MRD-neg, including 76.9% (83/108) and 88.0% (95/108) at end of C3 and C6, respectively. Estimated 6-mo progression-free survival, overall survival, and duration of response rates were 97.1%, 98.1%, and 98.0%, respectively. Among the 17 pts with TP53m, 15 (88.2%) achieved objective response, 11 (64.7%) achieved CR, and 16 (94.1%) achieved MRD-neg any time during AVR induction; all 3 (100%) pts with TP53m who reached end of C13 achieved MRD-neg CR. Tx-emergent AEs (TEAEs; AVR induction + C14) in ≥30% of pts were diarrhea (45.4%), headache (41.7%), and neutropenia (38.9%). G≥3 TEAEs occurred in 63 (58.3%) pts, most commonly (≥5 pts) neutropenia (n=29; 26.9%), pneumonia (n=8; 7.4%), neutrophil count decreased (n=7; 6.5%), and thrombocytopenia (n=6; 5.6%). Serious TEAEs occurred in 33 (30.6%) pts, most commonly (≥2 pts) pneumonia (n=6; 5.6%), febrile neutropenia (n=4; 3.7%), and fungal pneumonia, neutropenic sepsis, sepsis, and pyrexia (n=2 each; 1.9%). TEAEs led to death in 1 pt (non-small cell lung cancer). Tumor lysis syndrome (G2) was reported in 1 pt. Atrial fibrillation/flutter was reported in 3 pts (G1, n=1; G2, n=1; G3, n=1); ventricular arrhythmia (extrasystole) was reported in 1 pt (G2).Conclusion: At this early DCO in pts with TN MCL, with most pts yet to complete induction tx, AVR demonstrated rapid, deep responses, with high CR and MRD negativity rates overall and in pts with TP53m. Among pts who completed AVR induction, all achieved MRD-neg CR. AVR had an acceptable toxicity profile. At the time of submission, 73 (97.3%) of the 75 pts who have reached C15D1 achieved MRD-neg CR per PET-CT. Further update of fully validated results when all pts are expected to have completed AVR induction will be presented.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→