MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417008718 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-2947

Venous thromboembolism and bleeding rates in pregnant and postpartum patients with sickle cell disease

2025· article· en· W4417008718 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Alexandra Galls, Maureen Achebe, Sharl Azar, Nancy Berliner, Jean M. Connors, Elizabeth S. Klings, Arielle L. Langer, Thomas F. McElrath, Patrick T. McGann, Deborah Siegal, Layla Van Doren, Lauren E. Merz

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensOttawa Public HealthUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInterquartile rangePregnancyOdds ratioIncidence (geometry)AspirinRetrospective cohort studyLow molecular weight heparinVenous thromboembolismAcute chest syndromeCohort

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) are major causes of increased maternal morbidity observed in people with sickle cell disease (SCD). The reported incidence of VTE in pregnant and postpartum patients with SCD is 2-17% compared to 0.05-0.12% antepartum and 0.07-0.2% postpartum in the general population. The odds of PPH are ~2x greater in patients with SCD compared to Black patients without SCD, raising concern about routine thromboprophylaxis during and after pregnancy. Existing data on VTE and bleeding risks have significant limitations with a wide range of reported VTE incidence and limited reporting of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis or aspirin (ASA) use, SCD phenotype, and pregnancy characteristics. We report results from a regional, retrospective cohort describing rates of VTE, bleeding, and thromboprophylaxis use in pregnant and postpartum patients with SCD. Methods: We performed an IRB-approved electronic medical record analysis that included all patients with SCD and one or more pregnancies between 2015 and 2025 at the integrated Mass General Brigham hospital system. Demographics, medication use, laboratory data, pregnancy and SCD characteristics, and VTE and bleeding events during pregnancy and the postpartum period—defined as time of conception to 90 days postpartum—were recorded. Primary objectives were to determine rates of VTE, bleeding, and thromboprophylaxis use. Continuous variables were summarized as median with interquartile range (IQR), and categorical variables as proportions (95% confidence intervals [CI]); group comparisons for categorical data used chi-square tests. Results: Forty eligible patients with 60 pregnancies were identified and included in the analytic cohort. 70% (28/40) identified as Black or African American and 18% (7/40) identified as Hispanic. Median age at delivery was 33.8 years (IQR: 27.4-36.7), and median pre-pregnancy BMI was 24.7 kg/m2 (IQR: 22.7-28.4). Genotypes included HbSS (63%, 25/40), HbSC (23%, 9/40), HbSβ0(8%, 3/40), HbSβ+(5%, 2/40), and HbS/Quebec-Chori (3%, 1/40). Antepartum or postpartum thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in only 15% (95% CI: 7-29%, 9/60) of pregnancies, predominantly for history of VTE (n=8/9). ASA was prescribed in 68% (95% CI: 49-93%, 41/60) of pregnancies. VTE occurred in 17% (95% CI: 8-31%, 10/60) of pregnancies. Of the VTE events, 90% (9/10) included a pulmonary embolism diagnosis, and 50% (5/10) occurred postpartum (median: 7 days; IQR: 3-15). At the time of VTE diagnosis, 3 patients were taking ASA and 1 was prescribed 40mg enoxaparin daily. All were subsequently treated with anticoagulation at therapeutic dosing. There was no difference in rate of VTE by Hb genotype (p=0.12). No arterial thromboses or deaths were reported. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was administered in 67% (95% CI: 48-91%, 40/60) of pregnancies with 52% (95% CI: 35-73%, 31/60) receiving at least one RBC unit within 72 hours of delivery. Of deliveries with reported estimated blood loss (EBL) data, 57% (95% CI: 38-83%, 28/49) had EBL ≥500mL, and 20% (95% CI: 10-38%, 10/49) had EBL ≥1000mL (current EBL criteria for PPH). Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 7% (95% CI: 2-17%, 4/60) of pregnancies with 75% (3/4) of events occurring in patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation for treatment of pregnancy-associated VTE. Bleeding impacted 30% (3/10) of therapeutic anticoagulation prescriptions. Discussion: This report characterizes VTE events, bleeding events, and thromboprophylaxis use in a cohort of pregnant and postpartum patients with SCD at a large, academic referral center. VTE occurred in 17% of patients in this cohort, much higher than the typically reported incidence in the general population. Frequency of reported EBL ≥1000mL during delivery (current EBL criteria for PPH) and of transfusions within 72 hours of delivery was also high. Antepartum or postpartum thromboprophylaxis was prescribed infrequently and predominantly used in patients with prior VTE history. These data emphasize the high risk of both thrombosis and bleeding in pregnant and postpartum patients with SCD, complicating routine thromboprophylaxis use. Ongoing multicenter data collection will allow for improved estimates of VTE and bleeding as well as identification of associated risk factors which will inform the design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in this population.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→Travaux en français237 207→