MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417009115 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3578

Analysis of predictive factors for POD24 in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma receiving bendamustine-rituximab with or without acalabrutinib in the phase 3 ECHO trial

2025· article· en· W4417009115 sur OpenAlexaff
Chan Y. Cheah, Stephen E. Spurgeon, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Mélina Boutin, Eva González‐Barca, Krimo Bouabdallah, Ellie John, Tatjana Krautloher, Victoria Otero, Brad S. Kahl

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversité de Sherbrooke
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMantle cell lymphomaLogistic regressionHazard ratioConfidence intervalPlaceboRituximabProportional hazards modelPhases of clinical researchOdds ratio

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction In mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), clinical progression of disease within 24 months of treatment initiation (POD24) is associated with poorer outcomes. Acalabrutinib plus bendamustine-rituximab (ABR) has been approved for patients with treatment-naive (TN) MCL based on the results of the phase 3 ECHO trial (NCT02972840), in which ABR significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus BR (PBR; hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.94; P=0.0160). Here, we searched for clinical and biological factors predicting POD24 in the ECHO trial. Methods Patients aged ≥65 years with TN MCL and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2 were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ABR or PBR. Randomization was stratified according to geographic region and simplified MCL International Prognostic Index (sMIPI) score. BR was given for 6 cycles followed by rituximab maintenance for 2 years in patients achieving a partial or complete response (CR). Acalabrutinib (100 mg twice daily) or placebo was administered at study start until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover to acalabrutinib was permitted at PD. POD24 was defined as patients who progressed within the first 24 months after randomization. Patients who withdrew from the study or were lost to follow-up before 24 months were excluded. Individual and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between POD24 and clinical or biological factors at baseline, including treatment modality. The initial saturated multivariate logistic regression model included parameters that were significant based on individual logistic regression models and were of clinical interest. A backwards selection process with threshold P<0.05 was used to generate the final multivariate logistic regression model. TP53 mutation status was excluded from multivariate logistic regression analyses due to a high proportion of missing data. Results At the data cutoff used in this analysis (February 15, 2024), median time on study was 44.9 (range, 0.03–81.3) months. Of 598 total patients, 493 were assessed for POD24, of which 152 (30.8%) had POD <24 months. At baseline, a higher proportion of patients with POD <24 months (vs POD >24 months) were aged ≥75 years (35.5% vs 22.9%), were male (81.6% vs 66.3%), had Ann Arbor stage IV disease (92.1% vs 82.7%), had blastoid/pleomorphic histology (22.4% vs 9.4%), had Ki-67 ≥30% (60.5% vs 43.4%), had lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > upper limit of normal (ULN; 36.2% vs 11.4%), and had TP53 mutation (16.4% vs 5.6%). A higher proportion of patients had early progression with PBR (36%; n=90/249) versus ABR (25%; n=62/244). As determined by individual logistic regression analyses (P<0.05), the odds of POD <24 months were increased with baseline covariates of age ≥75, male sex, ECOG performance status ≥1, bulky disease ≥5 cm, Ann Arbor stage IV, extranodal disease, blastoid/pleomorphic histology, Ki-67 ≥30%, high-risk sMIPI score (6–11), LDH >ULN, decreasing hemoglobin concentration, increasing absolute neutrophil count, increasing absolute lymphocyte count, and TP53 mutation. Treatment with acalabrutinib reduced odds of early progression by 40%. Parameters that retained their predictive role (increased odds of early progression) after performing multivariate logistic regression analyses (P<0.05) included age ≥75 (odds ratio [OR] 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20–3.17), male sex (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.59–4.88), Ann Arbor stage IV disease (OR 2.95; 95% CI 1.38–6.32), Ki-67 ≥30% (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.09–2.86), LDH >ULN (OR 3.44; 95% CI 2.00–5.94), and blastoid/pleomorphic histology (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.02–3.70). After adjustment for predictors of POD24, treatment with acalabrutinib significantly reduced the odds of early progression versus placebo (acalabrutinib vs placebo OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.37–0.91). Conclusion In this analysis of the ECHO trial, nonmodifiable predictive factors that increased odds of early progression (POD24) were age ≥75, male sex, Ann Arbor stage IV disease, Ki-67 ≥30%, LDH >ULN, and blastoid/pleomorphic histology. Treatment with acalabrutinib reduced odds of POD24.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→