MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417009738 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5352

Fixed treatment duration mosunetuzumab continues to demonstrate clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior therapies: 5-year follow-up of a pivotal Phase II study

2025· article· en· W4417009738 sur OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Budde, Laurie H. Sehn, Matthew J. Matasar, Stephen J. Schuster, Sarit Assouline, John Kuruvilla, Won Seog Kim, Chan Y. Cheah, Mazyar Shadman, Sascha Dietrich, Matthew Ku, Dima El‐Sharkawi, Norma C. Gutiérrez, Michael C. Wei, Shen Yin, Samuel Tracy, Fidelis Sabalvaro, Elicia Peneul, Nancy L. Bartlett

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreJewish General HospitalSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFollicular lymphomaAdverse effectTolerabilityDosingIncidence (geometry)Progressive diseasePhases of clinical researchLymphoma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Mosunetuzumab is the first FDA- and EMA-approved CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody for the treatment of R/R FL after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. In a pivotal Phase II study (NCT02500407), fixed-duration mosunetuzumab demonstrated high response rates, durable remissions, and a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R FL (Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022; Shadman et al. ASH 2024; Cheah et al. EHA 2025). We report updated efficacy and safety data for mosunetuzumab in patients with R/R FL after a median follow-up of 5 years. Methods: Eligible patients with R/R FL Grade 1–3a and ≥2 prior therapies received intravenous mosunetuzumab for a fixed duration with step-up dosing in Cycle (C)1. Hospitalization was not mandatory. Patients with a complete response (CR) by C8 completed therapy with no additional cycles; patients with partial response or stable disease post C8 could continue treatment for up to 9 additional cycles (a total of 17 cycles). Efficacy analyses by investigator assessment (Cheson et al. 2007 criteria) included CR rate, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), duration of CR (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Safety and tolerability were assessed by describing the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). After the AE reporting period (90 days after the last dose or start of new anti-lymphoma treatment), mosunetuzumab-related serious AEs were to be reported. Results: Ninety patients with R/R FL were enrolled, of whom 52% had a history of disease progression within 24 months from the start of first-line therapy (POD24) and 53% were double refractory. Median age was 60 years (range: 29–90) and median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range: 2–10). As of May 1, 2025, median time on study was 60.2 months (range: 2–72). In the overall population (N=90), the ORR and CR rate were 78% and 60%, respectively; median DOR (n=70) was 46.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.7–not estimable [NE]), and median DOCR (n=54) was not reached (95% CI: 44.1–NE). The 54-month DOR and DOCR rates were 46% (95% CI: 33.8–59.1) and 52% (95% CI: 36.2–67.9), respectively. Median PFS was 24.0 months (95% CI: 12.0–53.2) in all patients, and 61.0 months (95% CI: 47.6–NE) in patients who achieved CR. The 5-year PFS rates were 36% (95% CI: 25.3–47.7) and 57% (95% CI: 42.0–71.6) in all patients and patients with CR, respectively. Median OS was not reached (95% CI: NE), and the 5-year OS rate was 78% (95% CI: 69.6–87.4). Eighteen deaths were reported; 13 due to progressive disease, 1 each due to unexplained death, cardiac arrest and sepsis, and 2 with unknown cause. The median TTNT in all patients was 64.1 months (95% CI: 21.7–NE), and the 5-year TTNT rate was 51% (95% CI: 39.8–61.8). Five patients received mosunetuzumab retreatment of whom 3 achieved a subsequent CR. In the 47 patients with POD24, the ORR (81%) and CR rate (60%) were consistent with those observed in the overall population. Median DOCR was 50.1 months (95% CI: 18.7–NE), and the 54-month DOCR rate was 48% (95% CI: 24.9–71.5); median PFS was 21.7 months (95% CI: 11.6–61.0) and the 5-year PFS rate was 36.9% (95% CI: 20.7–53.1), with a small number of patients remaining at risk. No new AEs were reported since the 4-year follow-up. All patients had at least one AE; the most common AE was cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 44%). CRS events were mainly Grade 1/2 (Grade 1, n=23; Grade 2, n=15; Grade 3, n=1; Grade 4, n=1) and were all resolved. AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 4% of patients; no treatment-related Grade 5 AEs occurred. The recovery of B cells and immunoglobulin M (IgM) was observed in patients with a CR. Conclusions: This report represents the longest follow-up for a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody in R/R FL. Fixed-duration mosunetuzumab treatment yields durable responses, and long-term survival continues to be observed in patients with heavily pre-treated R/R FL. The data highlight the durable long-term remissions achieved with mosunetuzumab in this setting. Updated data confirm that B-cell recovery is observed and sustained. In parallel, IgM levels recover with a similar time course. In both cases after 2 years a majority of patients have recovered to normal levels. The safety profile remained manageable, with no new toxicities reported.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,292 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207