MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417009748 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5353

Fixed-duration subcutaneous mosunetuzumab continues to demonstrate high rates of durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma after ≥2 prior therapies: 3-year follow-up from a pivotal Phase II study

2025· article· en· W4417009748 sur OpenAlexaff
Sarit Assouline, Nancy L. Bartlett, Laurie H. Sehn, Pratyush Giri, John Kuruvilla, Stephen J. Schuster, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Keith Fay, Georg Heß, Martin Dreyling, Norma C. Gutiérrez, Eva Cybulski, Fidelis Sabalvaro, Elicia Peneul, Samuel Tracy, Denison Kuruvilla, Joseph Chen, Volker Wiebking, Michael C. Wei

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British ColumbiaJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFollicular lymphomaRefractory (planetary science)DosingComplete responsePhases of clinical researchProgressive diseaseFollicular phaseLymphoma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In a pivotal Phase II study (NCT02500407), subcutaneous (SC) mosunetuzumab (Mosun), a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, achieved high response rates and durable remissions, and demonstrated pharmacokinetic non-inferiority to the intravenous (IV) formulation in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior lines of therapy, including those with high-risk features (Bartlett et al. ASH 2024; Hess et al. EHA 2025). We report updated efficacy and safety data from the pivotal Phase II study of Mosun SC in pts with R/R FL after three years of follow-up. Methods: Pts had R/R FL Grade (Gr) 1–3a and ≥2 prior therapies. Fixed-duration Mosun SC was administered (≤1mL volume) in 21-day cycles with step-up dosing in Cycle (C)1 (C1 Day [D]1, 5mg; C1D8, 45mg; C1D15, 45mg; C2D1 onwards, 45mg). Hospitalization was not mandatory. Pts with a complete response (CR) by C8 completed treatment without additional cycles; those with a partial response or stable disease could continue therapy for up to 17 cycles. Pts who achieved a CR with initial treatment and relapsed after the end of treatment were eligible for re-treatment. Responses were assessed per Cheson 2007 criteria. CR rate, overall response rate (ORR), duration of (complete) response (DO[C]R), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and safety endpoints were investigator-assessed. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and response to re-treatment were exploratory endpoints. Results: Ninety-four pts were enrolled in this pivotal cohort; median age was 65 years (range: 35–84), 87% had Ann Arbor Stage III/IV disease, 66% were refractory to prior anti-CD20 therapy, 43% had progressed within 24 months from start of first-line treatment (POD24), 30% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and 23% had bulky disease (>7cm). As of May 1, 2025, median follow-up was 35.5 months (range: 1–48). The ORR and CR rate in the overall population were 74% and 63%, respectively. Median DOR and DOCR were 25.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21–39) and 33.6 months (95% CI: 22–not estimable [NE]), respectively. Median PFS was 18.5 months (95% CI: 11–28) and median OS was not reached (95% CI: NE); the estimated 30-month PFS and OS rates were 37% (95% CI: 27–48) and 83% (95% CI: 75–91), respectively. Median TTNT was 39.7 months (95% CI: 36–NE). In 59 pts with a CR, the 30-month PFS and OS rates were 56% (95% CI: 42–69) and 92% (95% CI: 85–100), respectively, and median PFS was 35.9 months (95% CI: 25–NE). Of 9 pts re-treated with Mosun, 7 (78%) responded, and 6 (67%) achieved a CR. At the clinical cut-off date, 4/7 re-treated pts with a response remained in remission. In pts with POD24, the ORR and CR rates were 70% and 58%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.7 months (95% CI: 6–NE) and the 30-month PFS rate was 41% (95% CI: 25–57). In pts with bulky disease, the ORR was 68% and CR rate was 55%. Median PFS was 28.3 months (95% CI: 6–NE) and the 30-month PFS rate was 42% (95% CI: 18–66), though few pts remained at risk. No new cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events or fatal, serious, or Gr ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported since the previous analysis. Injection site reactions remained the most common AE (69%). Fatal AEs occurred in 5 pts (COVID-19 pneumonia, n=2; COVID-19, n=1; hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, n=1 [with active Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and lymphoma transformation]; general physical health deterioration, n=1). CRS events occurred in 30% of pts (Gr 3: n=2) and all resolved. Infections were reported in 55% of pts (Gr 1/2: 36%; Gr 3/4: 16%; Gr 5: 3%). Gr 3 febrile neutropenia was reported in 2 pts. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome events were reported. The safety profile during re-treatment was consistent with initial therapy, with only 2 (10%) Gr 1 CRS events, 1 serious AE, and no fatal AEs. Conclusions: In this updated analysis, with a median follow-up of 35.5 months, fixed-duration Mosun SC continued to demonstrate durable responses, similar to those previously reported for Mosun IV in a comparable patient population. The safety profile was manageable with low rates of CRS and infections, consistent with previous analyses. Mosun SC has a favorable benefit-risk profile with the convenience of outpatient accessibility and short administration times.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→