MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417010252 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-537

Mim8 prophylaxis in adults and adolescents with hemophilia A: 52-week efficacy and safety outcomes from the phase 3 FRONTIER2 study

2025· article· en· W4417010252 sur OpenAlexaff
Steven R. Lentz, Aby Abraham, Cihan Ay, Anthony Chan, Víctor Jiménez‐Yuste, Johannes Oldenburg, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Johnny Mahlangu, Tadashi Matsushita, L. van Vulpen, Renchi Yang, Amalie Rhode Høgh Nielsen, Ilgiz Rakhmatullin, Pratima Chowdary

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRandomized controlled trialImmunogenicityFactor IXConfidence intervalClotting factorClinical trialClinical endpoint

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Mim8 (denecimig) is a new-generation, bispecific antibody, activated factor VIII mimetic in clinical development for subcutaneous prophylaxis (PPX) for hemophilia A (HA) with or without inhibitors. The 26-week main phase of the phase 3 FRONTIER2 study (NCT05053139) demonstrated superiority of once-every-week (QW) and once-every-month (QM) Mim8 PPX in reducing annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for treated bleeds versus on-demand therapy or prior clotting factor concentrate (CFC) PPX. Aim To assess 52-week efficacy and safety of Mim8 PPX in adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) with HA with or without inhibitors from the FRONTIER2 extension phase. Methods In the 26-week main phase, participants were randomized to Mim8 QW or QM, or continued on-demand standard-of-care treatment. Participants were grouped by prior treatment regimen: on-demand or CFC PPX. In the 26-week extension, all on-demand participants switched to Mim8 PPX (QW or QM); others continued their assigned regimen. Mim8 was administered using a tiered-dosing approach. Primary endpoint: number of treated bleeds; selected secondary endpoints: number of injection-site reactions (ISRs) and anti-Mim8 antibodies. ABR was estimated using a negative binomial regression model. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed. Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained. Results Of 281 randomized participants, 97% completed the main phase and 96% the extension. Mean (min; max) age at baseline was 32 (13;64) years for the pre-study on-demand group (n=61) and 31 (12;69) years for the pre-study CFC PPX group (n=220). In the pre-study CFC PPX group vs the pre-study on-demand group, there was a higher proportion of patients with severe HA (86% vs 77%) and lower proportion with inhibitors (2% vs 44%). This analysis includes 27 newly reported participants from China. In the main phase, all participants who continued on-demand treatment (n=18) experienced treated bleeds. Estimated mean ABR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 16.09 (11.21;23.09). All participants entered the extension, during which 88% (Mim8 QW, n=7/8) and 70% (Mim8 QM, n=7/10) had zero treated bleeds. Estimated mean ABRs (95% CI) were 0.67 (0.13;3.61) and 0.79 (0.19;3.33), respectively. For participants previously treated on-demand: of those randomized to Mim8 QW, 86% (n=19/22) had zero treated bleeds in the main phase and 91% (n=19/21) in the extension, with estimated mean ABRs (95% CI) of 0.43 (0.17;1.07) and 0.45 (0.19;1.08), respectively; of those randomized to Mim8 QM, 91% (n=19/21) had zero treated bleeds in the main phase and 86% (n=18/21) in the extension, with estimated mean ABRs (95% CI) of 0.25 (0.08;0.76) and 0.25 (0.08;0.77), respectively. For participants previously on CFC PPX: of those randomized to Mim8 QW, 67% (n=74/111) had zero treated bleeds in the main phase and 70% (n=73/104) in the extension, with estimated mean ABRs (95% CI) of 2.32 (1.35;3.99) and 1.28 (0.78;2.08), respectively; of those randomized to Mim8 QM, 63% (n=69/109) had zero treated bleeds in the main phase and 69% (n=74/108) in the extension, with estimated mean ABRs (95% CI) of 1.79 (1.22;2.63) and 1.54 (0.92;2.59), respectively. Across main and extension phases, median ABR was 0 in all Mim8-treated arms. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74% (n=104) of Mim8 QW and 71% (n=100) of Mim8 QM participants. Most AEs were mild: 84% (399/475) of events with Mim8 QW and 82% (321/390) with Mim8 QM. Overall, ISRs occurred in 12% (n=17) of QW and 9% (n=12) of QM participants, accounting for 1.81% and 1.34% of injections, respectively. Overall, anti-Mim8 antibodies were detected in 21 (7%) recipients without clinical evidence of neutralizing activity; all were low (95%) or medium (5%) titer. No thromboembolic events, hypersensitivity reactions, or clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities were observed, including coagulation parameters. Conclusion Over 52 weeks, Mim8 QW and QM PPX provided sustained bleed protection in adults and adolescents with HA, with or without inhibitors, supporting its use as a long-term prophylactic option. During the extension, Mim8 was well tolerated, with infrequent ISRs, few serious AEs, no thromboembolic events or hypersensitivity reactions, and no anti-Mim8 antibodies with clinical impact. Participants completing FRONTIER2 are eligible for the open-label extension, FRONTIER4 (NCT05685238). Mim8 may offer an effective and convenient approach to reducing disease and treatment burden in this population.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→