MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417011959 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-2168

Characterization of the plasma proteome of multiple myeloma and its precursor conditions and identification of a prognostic high-risk signature of progression

2025· article· en· W4417011959 sur OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth D. Lightbody, D.R. Mani, Hasmik Keshishian, Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, Ankit K. Dutta, Esperanza Martín‐Sánchez, Elise Rees, Christine‐Ivy Liacos, Nayda Bidikian, Habib El‐Khoury, Hadley Barr, Ting Wu, Junko Tsuji, Sarah Nersesian, Nang Kham Su, Cody J. Boehner, Michael P. Agius, Michelle P. Aranha, Sabrin Tahri, Laura Hevenor, Katherine Towle, Erica Horowitz, Jacqueline Perry, Maya Davis, Kelly A. Walsh, John E. Ready, Catherine R. Marinac, Kwee Yong, Gad Getz, Efstathios Kastritis, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos, Bruno Paiva, Namrata D. Udeshi, Michael A. Gillette, Steven A. Carr, Irene M. Ghobrial

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMultiple myelomaMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceProteomeBone marrowDiseasePlasma cellPlasma cell neoplasmMyeloma proteinWaldenstrom macroglobulinemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Multiple Myeloma (MM) precursors Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM) have variable risk of progression to MM and identifying which patients may progress is challenging. Bone marrow (BM) biopsies are used for staging and identifying high-risk events associated with progression. However, they are invasive and cannot be repeated often for monitoring tumor burden. Proteome profiling of peripheral blood (PB) plasma may advance non-invasive precursor disease staging, monitoring and characterization. Here, we performed comprehensive plasma proteomic profiling across the MM disease continuum, including progressive and stable disease, to provide biological insights and identify protein-based markers of high-risk disease for improved prognostication. Methods We executed high-throughput plasma proteomic profiling for ~3000 proteins using the Olink® Explore 3072 library and Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) technology. We profiled 462 PB plasma samples from 351 individuals, including MGUS (n=66), SMM (n=174), MM (n=49), and healthy donors (n=98). Samples from patients with progressive disease (n=32) and stable disease (n=32) with matched clinical follow-up time were also profiled; 17/32 patients with progressive disease had sequential samples from both precursor and active disease, while 15/32 patients had a precursor stage sample only. Precursor PB samples ranged 1.04-6.91 years (median of 2.33 years) prior to MM progression. T-tests, ANOVAs, and a linear mixed effect model were used to identify significant proteins across disease stages and progression status. Results were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg Method. A subset of individuals also underwent single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of tumor and immune cells from paired PB/BM from the same proteomics timepoint to enable cellular mapping of signals detected in the plasma. Results We captured high levels of plasma cell surface proteins, including BCMA, SLAMF7, CD38 and FCRL5, highlighting the utility of PEA technology to monitor soluble levels of clinically relevant targets. We analyzed functional protein networks showing stepwise dysregulation over disease progression and identified enrichment of proteins involved in immune evasion, cell motility, inflammation and cell adhesion. Correlation analysis of proteins with clinical features demonstrated BCMA and TACI levels had a strong combined positive correlation with BM plasma cell infiltration, M-protein and FLC ratio. Additional proteins, FCRL5, CD79B, MZB1, CD48, FCRLB, LY9 and QPCT, showed moderate positive correlations specifically with BM infiltration, suggesting their potential as surrogate markers for BM tumor burden and/or for improving risk prediction in routine blood-based assessments of precursor patients. We next aimed to improve the discrimination of disease states by training a machine learning-based classifier using plasma proteomic features and assigning samples to disease stages. We demonstrated 97% SMM/MM samples could be identified from healthy samples, indicating our classifier could confidently screen disease-related cases. Moreover, 85% of SMM samples were correctly classified as SMM, while misclassified cases labelled as MM exhibited early signs of progression, suggesting that the plasma proteome may provide earlier indications of evolving disease. Next, by evaluating protein levels in patients with progressive and stable SMM disease, we identified a prognostic five-protein signature that was significantly elevated at the precursor stage timepoint of patients who progressed to active MM. Validation of the signature in an external international cohort collected from three institutions confirmed that 4 of the 5 proteins were indeed significantly elevated in patients with progressive disease. Finally, integrative analysis of scRNA-seq of tumor/immune cells and plasma proteomics was used to elucidate cell-type level information of the signature proteins. Four of the proteins were predominately expressed in malignant vs. non-malignant plasma cells and/or memory B-cells, suggesting the signature partially provides a readout of malignant plasma cell biology. Conclusion Overall, we characterized dysregulated protein networks across disease stages, developed a plasma-based classifier for accurate stage classification, and identified and validated a prognostic protein signature associated with progressive disease.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→