MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417013642 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-4846

Quality of life and functional improvements with efanesoctocog alfa in patients with moderate-to-severe Hemophilia A: A real-world survey

2025· article· en· W4417013642 sur OpenAlexaff
Maissaa Janbain, Miguel A. Escobar, Manuel Carção, Nathan Ball, E. Morton, Duygu Bozkaya, Sylvie Bozzi, Nicole Tsao

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHaemophiliaQuality of life (healthcare)McNemar's testClotting factorFactor IXBody mass indexCoagulopathyEQ-5D

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Hemophilia A (HA) is a rare X-linked bleeding disorder characterized by deficiency or dysfunction of clotting factor VIII (FVIII), resulting in breakthrough bleeding that can cause joint damage and impair patients' quality of life (QoL). Efanesoctocog alfa (Efa) is a first-in-class high-sustained FVIII replacement therapy designed to decouple FVIII from endogenous von Willebrand factor to increase its half-life. It was approved in the United States (US) in February 2023 for once weekly prophylaxis of bleeds in patients with HA without inhibitors. Real-world data on patient experience with prophylactic Efa are emerging. Aim: To assess real-world, patient-reported experiences with prophylactic Efa in individuals with moderate-to-severe HA without inhibitors. Methods: This study used data from the Adelphi Real World Hemophilia Patient Survey, a cross-sectional survey of people with HA receiving Efa, collected between December 2024 and February 2025. Eligible participants were adult males (≥18 years) in the US with moderate-to-severe HA (based on baseline clotting factor levels), who had been receiving Efa prophylaxis for ≥6 months at the time of survey completion. The survey captured patient demographics, clinical and humanistic burden, treatment satisfaction, and treatment patterns. Descriptive analyses were used for continuous and categorical variables. Where applicable, symmetry tests or McNemar tests were used to compare outcomes before and after initiating Efa (significance threshold: p<0.05). Results: Thirty-one patients were included. The mean (SD) patient age was 40.2 (15.5) years, and the mean (SD) body mass index was 28.3 (6.8) kg/m². Most patients were White (80.6%), worked full-time (61.3%), commercially insured (54.8%), and had severe HA (74.2%). The majority (83.9%) of patients reported never having inhibitors. The most recent treatments prescribed prior to Efa were standard half-life products (64.5%), extended half-life products (45.2%), emicizumab (32.3%), and others (6.5%) (groups exceed 100% as multiple treatments were used either prophylactically or on-demand). The median (IQR) duration of Efa use was 388.0 (266.0–557.0) days, and the mean (SD) proportion of doses reportedly taken as prescribed was 95.0% (7.3%). Most patients reported being “completely satisfied” or “satisfied” with Efa in terms of overall experience (93.5%), bleed prevention (96.8%), and improvement in patients' ability to perform physical activity (79.3%) (n=29). When comparing Efa to prior therapies for hemophilia control, 83.9% rated it as better, 9.7% as comparable, and 6.5% as worse. After Efa initiation, relative improvements were observed in daily functioning and physical activity. A greater proportion of patients reported no difficulty with any activities of daily living after receiving Efa (51.6% pre- to 67.7% post-switch; p=0.1250). The proportion of patients reporting difficulty with walking decreased following switching (35.5% pre- to 16.1% post-switch; p=0.0312). The number of patients who often avoided physical activity was higher pre-switch than post switch; (38.7% pre to 16.1% post-switch; p=0.0186). Since starting Efa, a significantly higher proportion of patients reported no longer taking preventive measures (i.e., increasing the regular dose of prophylactic treatment, taking an extra dose of factor, or other), increasing from 19.4% pre- to 58.1% post-switch; p=0.0005. Although not statistically significant, fewer patients reported increasing their regular prophylactic doses or taking extra factor doses ahead of physical activity after switching (22.6% pre- to 6.5% post-switch; p=0.0625, and 32.3% pre- to 19.4% post-switch; p=0.1250, respectively). Conclusions: This is the first real-world, patient-reported outcomes study of prophylactic Efa use among patients with moderate-to-severe HA. Most patients rated Efa more favorably for hemophilia control compared to previous regimens. Improvements were observed in daily functioning, participation in physical activity, and a reduced need for preventive measures and additional prophylactic doses.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→