MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417014962 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5505

Late immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) in patients with relapsed refractory large B-cell lymphoma receiving anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

2025· article· en· W4417014962 sur OpenAlexaff
Rintu Sharma, Pamella Paul, Harjot Vohra, Eshetu G. Atenafu, John Kuruvilla, Michael Crump, Robert Kridel, Sita Bhella, Vishal Kukreti, Chloe Yang, Abi Vijenthira, Anca Prica, Christine Chen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCytopeniaNeutropeniaRituximabFebrile neutropeniaLymphomaLeukopeniaSalvage therapyAnemiaRefractory (planetary science)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Cytopenias are common following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients (pts) with relapsed refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and are associated with increased non-relapse mortality (Wudhikarn 2020). The CAR HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) score (Rejeski et al, 2021) incorporating baseline blood counts, CRP and ferritin, is a validated tool for predicting cytopenias. Although early cytopenias up to day 30 are expected, late cytopenias beyond day 30 are less well understood. We therefore focused on describing the trajectory of late cytopenias to 1 year and survival outcomes in this report. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective study in pts with R/R LBCL who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy from June 2020 to April 2024. Our primary objective was to evaluate the frequency of persistent cytopenias (beyond day 30) in R/R LBCL pts, with secondary objective to validate the CAR-HT score in predicting late cytopenias at 3, 6 and 12 months and survival outcomes in these pts. Pts with early disease progression within 60 days of CAR T infusion were excluded. Pts were censored at time of death or progression requiring systemic therapy, or last follow up. Cytopenias were graded by CTCAEv.5 and neutropenia was also graded by late immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) grading as described by EHA/EBMT (Rejeski 2022). Results: We identified 139 pts who received axi-cel or tisa-cel: 113 were included in our cytopenia analysis; 26 excluded for early progression, death, or initiation of subsequent therapy. Eighty-eight (78%) pts received axi-cel, and 25 (22%) received tisa-cel for treatment of R/R diffuse LBCL/high grade B-cell lymphoma (n=72), transformed LBCL (n=37), or primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (n=4); 46% (n=52) had primary refractory disease. Median prior lines of systemic treatment were 2 (range 2-6), 36% (n=41) prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and 28% (n=32) prior bendamustine. Pre-infusion high CAR-HT score (≥2) was observed in 57% (64/112); low score (0-1) in 43% (48/112). At 1 month post CAR T infusion, 98% (111/113) pts had any grade cytopenias in at least 1 lineage: anemia 94.6% (≥ Grade(G)3 11.5%), neutropenia 62.8% (≥G3 36%), thrombocytopenia 82% (≥G3 24%). At 3 months (mos.), 88% (88/101) pts had any grade cytopenias: anemia 80% (≥G3 9%), neutropenia 46% (≥G3 19%), thrombocytopenia 47% (≥G3 17%). Between day 30 and 100 post-infusion, 35% (35/101) of pts required at least 1 dose of GCSF while, 9% and 6% of pts required at least one blood and platelet transfusion support, respectively. Amongst pts alive and in remission, ≥G3 anemia was observed in 5% (4/79) at 6 mos and 3% (2/68) at 12 mos, ≥G3 thrombocytopenia persisted in 11% (9/79) and 1.5% (1/68), respectively. At 3-, 6-, and 12-mos post CAR T, any grade ICAHT was observed in 38% (39/101; ≥ G3 6%), 24% (19/79; ≥ G3 5%) and 13% (9/68; ≥G3 1.5%), respectively. Of the 19 pts with any grade ICAHT at 6 mos, 1 progressed, 2 developed AML, 2 had persistent neutropenia, 3 died from infections, and the remainder recovered their counts by 1 year. A high CAR-HT score was the only factor predictive of any grade ICAHT (p=0.020) or ≥ G3 ICAHT (p=0.036) at 3 months. No association was found with age, gender, CAR product, median number of prior therapies, prior ASCT or bendamustine exposure. At 6 mos, ICAHT was associated with both high CAR-HT score (p=0.0074) and high number of prior therapy lines (p=0.02). However, the CAR-HT score did not predict ICAHT at 1 year (p=0.28) as numbers were small. At median follow up of 21 mos (2-57) 32 patients died: 19 from disease progression, 6 from infection, 3 from AML/MDS, 4 unknown/unrelated causes. Median OS was not reached, while median PFS was 21 mos (95% CI 8.94-NR). Patients with high CAR-HT score had lower OS and PFS than low score patients, but this was not statistically significant [2-year OS 63% (95% CI 49-75) vs 82% (95% CI 65-91) p=0.1033; 2-year PFS 42% (95% CI 30-55) vs 55% (95% CI 40-68) p=0.55)]. Conclusion: Late cytopenias remain persistent toxicity after CAR T-cell therapy in RR LBCL. Although, the majority of our pts recovered counts by 1 year, a notable proportion develop adverse outcomes including late disease progression or MDS/AML. In this report, we validated the CAR-HT score in predicting ICAHT at 3 and 6 months, supporting its potential utility for resource planning and closer monitoring for these negative outcomes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,002

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→