Grip strength predicts overall survival of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in a multivariable model
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematologic disorder characterized by cytopenias and a risk of progression to leukemia. Frailty, a state of reduced physiologic reserve, is prevalent among older individuals and is common in patients with MDS. MDS specific frailty scores such as the FS-15 can refine existing prognostic disease models. Physical function markers such as grip strength are frequently used to assess physical performance as a marker of frailty. In other cancer populations, grip strength predicts disease-specific mortality and cardiovascular disease. However, a paucity of data exists on the relationship between markers of physical performance and MDS outcomes, particularly when other disease markers and functional evaluations are considered. The aim of the present study was to determine the value of physical function testing in predicting the survival of patients with MDS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients prospectively enrolled in the MDS-CAN registry (NCT02537990). The MDS-CAN registry (2006 to present) includes patients ≥ 18 years old with a diagnosis of MDS, MDS/MPN, or low blast count AML (20-30%). Grip strength, 10 x sit-stand test, and 4 meter walk test were collected as markers of physical performance. Grip strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer and was calculated as the average of three readings of the patient's dominant hand, stratified by sex. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models for overall survival were developed with backwards elimination. Results: A total of 1372 patients were included in the study, with a mean age at enrollment of 73.46 (SD 10.04) years. Most (896/1372; 65.31%) were male, while 529 (38.56%) received treatment with a hypomethylating agent. At a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 831 patients (60.57%) had died. 1022 patients had available grip strength data. Stratified by quartile, actuarial median overall survival (OS) (95% CI) was 23.6 months (19.1–27.9) for the lowest 25%, 28.2 months (22.4–39.9) for the 25th to 50th percentile, 38.9 months (29.2–47.1) for the 50th to 75th percentile, and 45 months (32.8-56.2) for the highest 25%. Reduced grip strength at baseline was associated with worse overall survival (Log-rank test p<.0001). These significant differences in overall survival were observed in longer term follow-up with 5-year OS of 39.3% (34.8-44.3%) in patients with grip strength above the median compared to 27.5% (23.1-32.7%) in patients with grip strength below the median. A 4 meter walk test faster than the median was associated with an actuarial median OS of 41.27 months (34.0-48.7), exceeding patients slower than median with actuarial median OS of 25.79 (23.0-30.2). A Stand-Sit test time below the median was associated with significantly higher actuarial median OS at 44.8 months (36.8-56.6) compared to 32.6 (25.9-37.6) months. Multivariable analysis included patient and disease-specific factors significant in univariate analysis. Grip strength measured at baseline below the median value retained an independent significant effect on OS measured from time of enrollment in multivariable analysis (HR 1.37 [1.11-1.69]). This multivariable analysis included the FS-15 assessment of frailty with HR 2.58 [1.93-3.43]) for scores of 0.26-0.6 vs. 0-0.25, HR 4.55 [2.40-8.65] for scores of 0.61-1.0 vs. 0-0.25, and HR 2.60 [1.54-4.37] for scores of 0.61-1.0 vs. 0.26-0.6. Other factors significant in multivariable analysis were QLQ-C30 Fatigue score below median (HR 0.75 [0.60-0.94]), higher ferritin (HR 1.13 [1.03-1.24]), IPSS-R (High Vs Low: HR 3.88 [3.01-5.00] Int vs low: HR 2.02 [1.55-2.65] High vs Int: HR 1.92 [1.48-2.48]), and MDS-Comorbidity index(HR 1.52 [1.22-1.9] for 1-2 vs 0 and HR 1.71 [1.18-2.48] for 3+ vs 0). Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that grip strength, an easy to obtain measure of physical functioning, predicts survival in MDS patients. We again validate the important prognostic impact of patient reported outcomes and patient-related factors that refine the prognosis of IPSS-R. Further research is warranted in assessing the impact of grip strength on treatment responses and tolerability in a longitudinal analysis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».