MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417015698 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1658

Real life study of ivosidenib in either monotherapy or combined with azacytidine for first line mutant IDH1 AML: A study from the french AML intergroup ALFA/filo

2025· article· en· W4417015698 sur OpenAlexaff
Pierre Péterlin, Maël Heiblig, Stéphane Morisset, Sarah Bertoli, Marie Sébert, Thomas Cluzeau, Corentin Orvain, Pierre‐Yves Dumas, Paolo Musiu, Sylvain Garciaz, Yohan Desbrosses, Gaspar Aspas Requena, Rudy Birsen, Pascal Turlure, Célestine Simand, Adrien Contejean, Célia Salanoubat, Benjamin Carpentier, Ambroise Marçais, Juliette Lambert, Delphine Lebon, Quentin Cabrera, Sarah Bonnet, Kamel Laribi, Anne Banos, Adrien Daniel, Marlène Ochmann, Cécile Pautas, Benjamin Papoular, Jamilé Frayfer, Gian Matteo Pica, Julia Hieulle, Nicolas Vallet, Ariane Mineur, Arnaud Pigneux, Christian Récher, Stéphane de Botton

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensHotel Dieu Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIDH1Adverse effectMyeloid leukemiaRefractory (planetary science)AzacitidineFirst lineAbsolute neutrophil countRetrospective cohort studyMyeloid

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: IDH1 mutations are found in 6-10% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. Ivosidenib (IVO), an oral mIDH1 inhibitor, is approved for newly diagnosed mIDH1 AML in patients (pts) aged ≥75 years or unfit for intensive chemotherapy as monotherapy (US), based on the results of the AG120-C-001 study (Roboz, Blood, 2020, median overall survival (mOS) 12.6 months) or with azacitidine (AZA) (US and Europe) based on the results of the AGILE study (Montesinos, NEJM, 2022, mOS 29.3 months). However, data available on IVO+/-AZA in real-life are limited. Method: This retrospective study (IVOOBS, NCT06377579)included pts treated in France between 01/2017 and 02/2024 through a compassionate use program with IVO+/-AZA for mIDH1 AML, front-line or at time of relapse or for a refractory disease. Here we focused only on newly diagnosed pts. The primary objective was OS and secondary objectives included response rate (ELN-2022 criteria) and toxicity. Results: 49 pts from 17 centers were included; 16 (33%) received IVO alone (IVO-mono cohort) and 33 (67%) the combination (IVO+AZA cohort). IVO-mono cohort (n=16) : The median age was 72 yo (IQR: 60 - 83.25), 62.5% were male. Most of the pts were unfit (PS > 2 in 92%) with high-risk disease (secondary AML n=14, including 8 pts who have already received AZA for prior hematologic disease; adverse (adv)-risk according to ELN-2022 classification n=7, 43%, intermediate (int)-risk n= 9, 57%). The median white blood count (WBC) was 2.67 Giga/L. The majority of pts started IVO at the recommended dose of 500 mg/day (d) (n=13, 81%), while 3 started at 250 mg/d (concomitant prescription of azole). Median duration of IVO treatment was short (3.25 months, IQR: 1.6-7.07) as 77% % (n=10) of IVO discontinuations occurred within 4 months (3 allo-HCT, 3 progressions, 2 differentiation syndrome (DS), 1 QT prolongation (QTp), 1 death). Any grades of DS and QTp were reported in 25% (n=4) and 7% (n=1) of pts, respectively, while grade 3-4 hepatic, infection and hematologic adverse events (AE) occurred in 0, 4 and 3 pts, respectively. Two deaths were linked to IVO (DS). Mortality at D30 and D60 was 6% and 25%, respectively. Composite complete remission (CCR) (CR/CRh/CRi) rate was 37% (31%/6%/0%), with no MLFS and 44% of non-responders (19% of pts not assessed (NA)). For pts receiving IVO at 500mg/d, CCR was 46% (38%/8%/0%). At 250mg/d, 2 pts did not respond and 1 was NA. Four pts (3 in CR, 1 in no response) received an allo-HCT after IVO. Among responders (n=6), 1 pt relapsed at 10.8 months. With a median follow-up (mFU) of 4.5 months, mOS was 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.07-not reached (NR)) and 2y OS 31.25% (95% CI: 15.11-64.64). IVO+AZA cohort (n=33): The median age was 78 yo (IQR: 75 – 80), 60% were male. The majority of pts were unfit (PS > 2 in 93%) and classified as int-risk (83%) according to ELN-2022 classification (adv-risk 17%). However, according to ELN-2024 classification, most pts had favourable-risk (n=22, 67%) (adv-risk n=2, NA n=9). The median WBC was 2.15 Giga/L. Nine pts (27%) had a secondary AML. The majority of pts started IVO at the dose of 500 mg/d (n=27, 82%), while 6 pts started at 250 mg/d (concomitant prescription of azole (n=5), previous cardiac history (n=1)). Median number of AZA cycles was 6 (range: 1; 28). Median duration of IVO treatment was 13.1 months (IQR: 8.4-18.4) and 26% (n=5) of IVO discontinuations occurred within 4 months (3 progressions, 2 deaths). Mortality at D30 and D60 was 3% and 9%, respectively. DS was reported in 3 pts (9%) and QTp in 2 (7%), any grades, while grade 3-4 hepatic, infection and hematologic AE occurred in 0, 5 and 8 pts, respectively. No death was linked to IVO. CCR was 73% (55%/12%/6%), 3% showed MLFS, 21% were non-responders and 3% NA. CCR was 78% (56%/15%/7%) and 50% (50%/0%/0%) for those receiving IVO at 500 mg/d and 250mg/d, respectively. Among responders (n=24), only 1 pt was consolidated with an allo-HCT and 8 (33%) relapsed at a median of 11.4 months. At relapse, 4 were treated with AZA+BCL2 inhibitor and 1 obtained CR. With a mFU of 16.6 months, mOS was NR (95% CI: 16.62-NR) and 2y OS 52% (95% CI: 35.55-76.56). Conclusion: This retrospective real-life study shows the reproducibility of the results of the AGILE study (IVO+AZA). Pts receiving IVO mono had poorer outcome compared to those of the AG120-C-001 study, likely because pts were at higher risk. The dose of 500 mg/d should also be preferred questioning the role of azole prophylaxis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,314
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→