MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417015853 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-4370

Community health worker training for sickle cell disease education in the consortium for newborn screening in Africa

2025· article· en· W4417015853 sur OpenAlexaff
Bernard Awuonda, Livingstone Gayus Dogara, Tracy Kobukindo, Obiageli Nnodu, Andrew Zapfel, Marie Benoit, Isaac Odame, Nancy Green, Venée N. Tubman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNewborn screeningCommunity health workersDiseaseIntervention (counseling)HemoglobinopathyCommunity healthHealth carePublic healthSickle cell anemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Sub-Saharan Africa bears more than 75% of the global burden of sickle cell disease (SCD), where limited newborn screening, diagnostic programs, and health care services result in high early childhood mortality. To address this challenge, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) established the Consortium on Newborn Screening in Africa (CONSA) to demonstrate the benefits of newborn hemoglobinopathy screening and early, continuous clinical intervention for babies diagnosed with SCD. CONSA is comprised of nine clinical sites in seven countries: Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. To date, results from 158,736 screened babies revealed 2201 (1.39%), with SCD, 25,708 (16.20%) with S and 2531 (1.59%) C trait, and 1814 (1.14%) with another variant. Of those diagnosed with SCD, only 44% have returned to CONSA sites for an initial clinical visit. To promote linkage to follow-up and clinical care, improve access to evidence-based interventions, and monitor health of children diagnosed with SCD, CONSA aims to deploy Community Health Workers (CHWs). Here we describe the approach and initial training of CHWs to perform the roles described above. Each country in CONSA has an existing national policy framework which establishes CHWs as community-based components of the health system, including their expected roles and responsibilities. Incorporation of SCD support within the sites' existing CHWs networks aims to aid program success and sustainability. To accommodate variability in the level of prior training among CHWs across sites, CONSA defined a minimum skill set required for participation in CONSA training. To implement this initiative, we developed a two-day training curriculum, including a guide to help facilitators train CHWs across various CONSA sites. The facilitator guides include key information on symptoms, home care interventions and available facility based treatment for SCD, along with key messages for community health education, strategies for counselling, and guided materials/exercises to enhance learning. Facilitators trained CHWs to support children who have not attended clinical visits, to conduct health education to reduce stigma around SCD in the community, and to promote newborn screening. We developed job aids for use in health education and counselling in the community, as well as pocket-sized guides translated into their local languages. A knowledge assessment was administered before and after all trainings to measure impact of the training. During Kenya’s initial site training, 81 CHWs were trained (61 (76%) female), of whom 63 (78%) had no prior dedicated training on SCD. Across the cohort, the most common age category was 40-49 years and the most common level of education was secondary school. The pre- and post-training knowledge assessments were completed by 72 (89%) participants, and 9 completed only the pre-test or post-test. The mean pre-test score was 71% (range: 25-95%) and post-test improved to 85% (range: 37-100%), with a mean change of 15% (P<0.01). Among CHWs, community health practitioners with secondary education had the greatest degree of test improvement compared to CHWs with other levels of education. On the pre-test, the most frequently missed question was related to interventions that improve health outcomes for persons with SCD. The areas with the most significant knowledge gain were the early signs and symptoms of SCD, danger signs in SCD, and the role of the CHW in the prevention of SCD complications. On both the pre- and post-tests, a majority of participants correctly addressed common misconceptions about SCD. A second training was held in Kaduna, Nigeria, we trained an additional 12 CHWs. All participants had a diploma as their highest level of education and had previously participated in some training on SCD. Pre- and post-training knowledge assessments were completed by all participants. Over the training, the knowledge assessment scores increased by 7% on average (pre-test: mean 90%, range: 83-100%; post-test: mean 98%, range: 94-100%; P<0.01). Analysis of those knowledge tests are ongoing.The CHW Initiative successfully enhanced knowledge of SCD diagnosis and care and prepared CHWs to be key partners in strengthening retention in care for children living with SCD. Trainings are now being implemented across all CONSA sites. We will evaluate the impact of CHWs trained in SCD on improving the attendance of affected babies at follow-up for clinical care.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,070

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetGlobal Maternal and Child Health→Travaux en français237 207→