MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417017123 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-2719

Prehabilitation prior to CAR T-cell therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Baseline physical function and toxicity outcomes

2025· article· en· W4417017123 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rahul K. Shah, Zhiping Luo, Rhodora C. Fontillas, Betty Holder, Nicholas Szewczyk, Amy Ayers, Uday Popat, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Paolo Strati, Chijioke Nze, Preetesh Jain, Michael Wang, Jason R. Westin, Sattva S. Neelapu, Amy Ng, Ki Y. Shin, Sairah Ahmed, An Ngo‐Huang, Dai Chihara

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrehabilitationLogistic regressionRehabilitationRetrospective cohort studyProspective cohort studyMinimal clinically important differenceAdverse effect

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests that baseline physical function may predict the toxicity of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy; however, there is no consensus on how best to evaluate physical function in this setting. The prehabilitation program at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) assesses patients 65 years and older or those with impairment prior to CAR T-cell therapy to assess baseline physical function and optimize physical activity and nutrition, aiming to improve function and reduce treatment-related complications of cellular therapy. This study evaluates the association of baseline physical function with the risk of CAR T-cell-related toxicity outcomes in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods This is a retrospective single-center study of patients with NHL at MDACC who were evaluated in the prehabilitation program (consisting of comprehensive evaluation by physical medicine and rehabilitation and physical therapy) prior to CAR T-cell therapy between June 2021 and December 2024. Baseline physical function measures included 6-minute walk test (6MWT), five times sit to stand (5XSTS), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), timed up and go (TUG) test, activity measure for post-acute care (AM-PAC) score, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Associations between these measures and CAR T-cell toxicity and outcomes, including occurrence and grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU admission, discharge disposition, and 90-day readmission, were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Physical function variables were analyzed as dichotomous variables using published normative cutoffs. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, race, sex, lymphoma subtype and CAR T-cell product. Results A total of 131 patients with NHL underwent baseline prehabilitation evaluation prior to CAR T-cell therapy. The median age was 73 years (range 52-86), 70% (n=92) were male, and 91% (n=119) were Caucasian. The majority had large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL, n=99, 76%), followed by mantle cell lymphoma (n=19, 15%), and follicular lymphoma (n=10, 8%). Patients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy (range 1-5). CRS occurred in 103 patients (79%; grade 1, 47%; grade 2, 24%; grade 3, 4%; grade 4, 3%) and ICANS occurred in 68 patients (52%, grade 1, 15%; grade 2, 9.2%; grade 3, 24%, grade 4, 5%). The median hospital LOS was 15 days (range 3-76), 23 patients (18%) required ICU admission, and a majority of patients were discharged home (n=115, 88%), with 11 (8.4%) being discharged to a skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation. Thirty-seven patients (28%) were re-admitted within 90 days of CAR T-cell infusion. In the multivariable model, shorter 6MWT (<400 meters, odds ratio [OR]: 3.03, 95%CI: 1.33-6.67), slower 10MWT (<1 m/s, OR: 4.55, 95%CI: 1.64-11.1) and longer TUG (≥12 seconds, OR: 11.4, 95%CI: 2.07-62.9) were associated with a significantly increased risk of ICANS. Shorter 6MWT (OR: 4.76, 95%CI: 2.08-11.1) and slower 10MWT (OR: 3.85, 95%CI: 1.49-10.0) were also associated with a longer hospital length of stay. Patients with TUG ≥12 seconds had a significantly higher risk of ICU admission (OR: 4.37, 95%CI: 1.06-18.1) and discharge disposition other than home (OR: 11.2, 95%CI: 1.9-66.2). In contrast, 5XSTS, AM-PAC score, and the ESAS showed no significant association with outcomes. Conclusion This study demonstrates that baseline physical function, as measured by 6MWT, 10MWT, and TUG test, is significantly associated with the risk of ICANS and hospital length of stay in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy for NHL. Worse performance on the TUG test was additionally associated with an increased risk of ICU admission and non-home discharge. These findings add to the growing evidence of the importance of a comprehensive physical function assessment to appropriately risk stratify patients and guide tailored strategies to reduce the risk of treatment-related morbidity of cellular therapy. Prospective studies are critical to evaluate whether interventions aimed at improving baseline physical function in frail patients can improve outcomes with CAR T-cell therapy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→