MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417018553 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-6411

High response rates and early treatment patterns with venetoclax and azacitidine from the prospective liven study: Real-world AML care in Canada

2025· article· en· W4417018553 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Kristjan Paulson, Lalit Saini, Michelle Geddes, Alejandro Garcia‐Horton, Stephanie Corriveau-Désilets, Nicole Laferriere, Adi J. Klil‐Drori, Fella Tamzalit, Guylaine Roy, Brian Leber

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensEspace pour la vieJuravinski Cancer CentreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeOccupational Cancer Research CentreLondon Health Sciences CentreThunder Bay Regional Research InstituteResearch Institute in Oncology and Hematology
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAzacitidineVenetoclaxMyeloid leukemiaAdverse effectConcomitantClinical endpointInterim analysisPopulationChemotherapy regimen

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults. The combination of venetoclax and azacitidine (Ven-Aza) has been approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML in patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on the VIALE-A trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02993523). The LIVEN study (NCT05424562) assesses prospectively real-world outcomes in Canadian patients treated with Ven-Aza. Methods: Adults ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed with AML were enrolled. Primary endpoint for the study is overall survival (OS). Data collected included demographics, medical history, cytogenetic and molecular information, concomitant medications, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), transfusion history, and International Working Group (IWG) response. Patients were risk stratified according to the ELN 2017 classification. The study enrolled 210 patients from 20 sites across Canada. Results: Participants were enrolled in the study from September 2022 to January 2025. This interim analysis includes 185 patients who were dosed with Ven-Aza and comprise the safety population. The efficacy population includes 144 patients who had at least 1 response assessment. Median (range) age of the patients was 76 (56-93) years. Over half (57.8%) of patients were over 75 years, and 26.5% were over 80 years. Most patients (69.2%) were male. Comorbidities were common: metabolic in 58.4% and cardiac in 37.8%; prior cancer was reported in 38.4% of the patients. Almost a third of patients (30.3%) had secondary AML (14.0% therapy related, 16.3% prior hematologic malignancy). Of patients with a prior hematologic neoplasm, 10 had a myeloproliferative disorder. Baseline ELN 2017 risk category was adverse in 57.2%, intermediate in 31.7%, and favorable in 11.0% of the patients. Among 106 patients tested for TP53 mutation, 31 (29.2%) were TP53 mutated. At data cut-off (May 20, 2025), 113 patients had discontinued therapy, while 72 had ongoing treatment. Seventy-six (41.1%) patients have died. With a median follow-up among survivors of 5.6 months, OS was not mature to report. Median (range) of treatment cycles completed was 4 (1-24). Median cycle and Ven treatment length was 30 days and 14 days during cycles 2 to 5, respectively. Concomitant antifungal use was approximately 25% during cycles 1-3, and 15% during cycle 4 and onwards. Median daily dose of Ven was 325 mg and 382 mg during cycles 2 and 3; it subsequently increased to 400 mg during cycles 4 and onwards. Composite complete response (complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CR/CRi]) was achieved in 96/144 (66.7%) of patients. Median (IQR) time to response was 71 (53-108) days. Among patients with favorable, intermediate and adverse ELN 2017 risk categories, composite CR was reported in 69.2%, 67.5% and 66.7%, respectively. Further, patients with and without TP53 mutation had a CR/CRi of 65.4% and 71.0%, respectively. Overall, 39 patients (27.1%) received concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) during treatment; these patients had a numerically higher composite CR (76.9%) compared to patients who did not receive G-CSF (62.9%). Median number of treatment cycles completed was 5.0 and 4.0 for patients who did and did not use G-CSF, respectively. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 133/185 (71.9%) of patients. Hematological Grade ≥3 TEAEs were experienced by 123/185 (66.5%) of patients: neutropenia (45.4%), thrombocytopenia (35.1%), anemia (27.6%), and lymphopenia (23.8%). Sixty (32.4%) patients experienced Grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia; 34 and 26 patients experienced febrile neutropenia during cycle 1 and cycle 2 and onwards, respectively. Serious TEAEs were experienced by 82/185 (44.3%) of the patients, with febrile neutropenia being the most common. Thirty (16.2%) patients experienced a TEAE leading to death. Conclusion: This prospective study in routine Canadian care of AML with Ven-Aza reports a response rate that is comparable to the VIALE-A trial (64.7%) in a relatively poor-risk cohort, including similar rates in patients with TP53 mutation. Early treatment patterns indicate potentially more treatment cycles were given to patients who had concomitant G-CSF use. With longer follow-up, the duration of response and OS will be reported.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,177

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→