MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417018940 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-443

CD19-CAR T cell therapy as a definitive consolidation in older adults with b-ALL in CR1 is safe and induces durable MRD- remission

2025· article· en· W4417018940 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ibrahim Aldoss, Xiuli Wang, Jianying Zhang, Min Guan, Ruby Espinosa, Mary C. Clark, Vaibhav Agrawal, Andrew Artz, Neguine Sanani, Lior Goldberg, Cashmir Gephart, Steve Kasten, Dileshni Tilakawardane, Jamie R. Wagner, Jinny Paul, Paul Koller, Anthony S. Stein, Vinod Pullarkat, Amandeep Salhotra, Ahmed Aribi, Guido Marcucci, Stephen J. Forman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFludarabineMinimal residual diseaseChimeric antigen receptorTolerabilityCohortToxicityDiscontinuationCAR T-cell therapyMaintenance therapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Older adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have dismal outcomes due to adverse-risk disease biology and poor tolerability of curative therapy. Low disease burden pre-lymphodepletion (LD) prior to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) in patients (pts) with relapsed B-ALL is associated with lower CAR-T related toxicity and improved durability of remission. We hypothesized that treating older pts with B-ALL in first complete remission (CR1) with CAR-T would result in 1) low rates of toxicity and 2) durable CR without additional consolidative therapy. Methods: This is a pilot single-center, one-arm study (NCT05707273) that enrolls pts ≥55 years with B-ALL who achieved CR1 with any frontline therapy and no upfront plan for transplant. Primary objectives are safety and tolerability. This study has a 6-pt safety lead-in (SLI) cohort at dose level 1 (200M CAR T cells) and an expansion cohort of an additional 12 pts. We used our naïve memory T cell-derived CD19-CAR-T (Aldoss I et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2022), administered following LD with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Pts are followed for toxicity and minimal residual disease (MRD) relapse by flow cytometry (FC) and clonoSEQ (if feasible) every 3 months for 2 years. Pts with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ disease may receive post CAR-T tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) maintenance starting after day 60 post CAR-T. Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of CAR T infusion to the date of progression/relapse or death, whichever came first. Patients with no event occurring by last contact will be censored. Results: We treated 6 pts in the SLI, none of whom experienced dose-limiting toxicity, and subsequently we opened the expansion cohort. As of July 20, 2025, we enrolled 20 pts and the study was completed. Two pts were ineligible for LD due to relapse (isolated central nervous system, CD19- MRD) post leukapheresis. For infused pts (n=18), the median age was 64 years (range: 55-79). Six pts had Ph+, 5 had not otherwise specified (NOS), 2 had hypodiploidy/TP53m, 2 had CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like, 1 each had KMT2Ar, EP300::ZNF384, and TCF3::PBX1; 15 (83%) and 2 (11%) pts received blinatumomab and inotuzumab as part of initial therapy, respectively. All patients were in MRD- CR by FC pre-LD. Thirteen (72%) pts developed transient grade (G) 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that resolved with tocilizumab +/- steroid. No pt developed immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) or ≥G2 CRS. With a median follow up of 14.5 months (range: 3.4-26.9), the 1-yr PFS rate is 90% (95% C.I. 80-100%). Only 1 pt (Ph+) developed molecular relapse (negative FC) at 6 months while on TKI maintenance. This pt then received a different TKI and consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and remains in remission. A second pt (75 yrs old; received induction with hyper CVAD + inotuzumab) developed therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome 18 months post CAR-T. All other pts remain in MRD- CR as of last follow up. The first pt on the study who had Ph- ALL is >2 years post CAR-T and remains in MRD- CR by clonoSEQ without additional therapy. All six pts with Ph+ ALL began TKI maintenance post CAR-T. There have been no deaths thus far on study. Despite the MRD- state pre-LD, CAR T cells expanded in vivo, peaking on days 7-14 (mean peak, 12.8%±2.7%; range, 0.9-36.5% in the CD3+ population). We observed CAR T cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in all 17 pts who had lumbar puncture evaluation on day 28 (median, 0.4x103/ml; range: 0.04–25.3x103/ml), which were detectable in the CSF up to 1 yr post therapy. For most patients, B-cell recovery was observed within 6 months post CAR-T. Walk speed and cognitive function were similar at baseline and day 100 [mean walk speed 1.02 vs 0.98 meter/second (p=0.46); median Montreal Cognitive Assessment of 26 vs 26 (0=0.17); median frailty scores 1 vs. 2 (p=0.17), respectively]. Conclusion: The use of CAR-T in older adults with B-ALL in MRD- CR1 is safe, with the only encountered toxicity of G1 CRS, which was manageable. CAR-T cells expanded in the blood and CSF despite the low antigen setting. We observed preliminary durable MRD- CR with preserved function and cognition on day 100 post CAR-T. Ongoing extensive correlative studies aim to better understand the features of CAR T cells that drive expansion in patients without active leukemia.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207