MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417019600 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3570

Nemtabrutinib in participants with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: Updated efficacy and safety from cohort g of the phase 2 bellwave-003 study

2025· article· en· W4417019600 sur OpenAlexaff
Wojciech Jurczak, Ana Lisa Basquiera, Isabelle Fleury, Sujun Gao, Arpád Illés, András Masszi, António Pinto, Sanne Lugthart, Ömür Gökmen Sevindik, Iryna Kriachok, Elizabeth Phillips, Fei Li, Chan Y. Cheah, Yan Xu, Mohammed Farooqui, Jing Yang, Fangfang Lv

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIbrutinibChemoimmunotherapyIdelalisibFollicular lymphomaCohortMantle cell lymphomaRefractory (planetary science)Bruton's tyrosine kinasePhases of clinical research

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have shown clinical activity as monotherapy in relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL); however, outcomes such as response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) have generally been limited. Nemtabrutinib, a potent, noncovalent, reversible BTKi taken by mouth (PO) once daily (QD), has shown promising antitumor activity in various B-cell malignancies. Nemtabrutinib has additional activity versus ibrutinib against Src family kinases and kinases related to ERK signaling, which may produce robust responses. Analysis of nemtabrutinib-treated cell lines using next-generation sequencing showed a lack of mutation in BTK and PLCG2 domains, which contrasts with other covalent and noncovalent BTKis such as ibrutinib and pirtobrutinib, respectively. Furthermore, nemtabrutinib has also showed preclinical efficacy in cell lines carrying BTK mutations derived from patients treated with pirtobrutinib. The phase 2 BELLWAVE-003 study (NCT04728893) was designed to assess nemtabrutinib in participants with various hematologic malignancies. Initial results for cohort G of BELLWAVE-003 (median study follow-up, 6.1 months) showed that nemtabrutinib had a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor efficacy at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 65 mg QD in participants with R/R FL. We present results from cohort G of BELLWAVE-003 after additional follow-up. Methods The multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 2 BELLWAVE-003 study enrolled participants with R/R CLL/SLL, FL, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, Richter transformation, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Participants with FL whose disease was R/R to chemoimmunotherapy and immunomodulatory agents received nemtabrutinib at the RP2D of 65 mg PO QD until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR) per Lugano 2014 criteria by BICR and safety. Exploratory end points included PFS per Lugano 2014 criteria by BICR and overall survival (OS). The data cutoff date was January 29, 2025. Results A total of 51 participants with R/R FL were treated with nemtabrutinib at the RP2D. The median study follow-up, defined as time from first dose to the data cutoff date, was 12.2 months (range, 0.7-23.2). The median age of participants was 59 years (range, 33-80); 23 participants (45%) were female, and 29 (57%) had Lugano stage IV disease. Participants had received a median of 4 (range, 1-11) prior lines of therapy. The median duration of treatment was 3.5 months (range, 0.2-15.6), with 11 participants (22%) remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. The ORR was 43% (95% CI, 29-58); 3 participants (6%) had a complete response, and 19 (37%) had a partial response. At the time of analysis, the median DOR was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.8-not reached), median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-8.3), and median OS was not mature. All-cause adverse events (AEs) of any grade were reported in 49 participants (96%). The most common all-cause AEs (≥20%) were neutrophil count decreased (24%) and platelet count decreased (20%). Grade 3 or 4 all-cause AEs occurred in 21 participants (41%). The most common grade 3 or 4 all-cause AEs (≥5%) were neutrophil count decreased (10%), thrombocytopenia (8%), neutropenia (6%), and platelet count decreased (6%). Dose reduction due to an all-cause AE were reported in 3 participants (6%; 1 with asthenia and blood creatinine increased, 1 with platelet count decreased, and 1 with sepsis). Discontinuation due to an all-cause AE occurred in 7 participants (14%; 1 each with asthenia, congestive cardiac failure, COVID-19 pneumonia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, toxicity to various agents, and urticaria). Death due to an all-cause AE occurred in 3 participants (6%; 1 each from respiratory tract infection, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, and medical aid in dying). No treatment-related AE resulting in death was reported. Conclusion With additional follow-up, nemtabrutinib continued to show promising antitumor efficacy in participants with FL who had received multiple prior lines of therapy and had progressed on both chemoimmunotherapy and immunomodulatory therapy. The safety profile remained manageable, with no unexpected AEs observed. These results support the ongoing clinical evaluation of nemtabrutinib in the R/R setting for FL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207