Thioguanine and decitabine can overcome hypomethylating agent resistance in patients with advanced myeloid malignancies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND Despite active therapies such as hypomethylating agents (HMA) and venetoclax advanced myeloid malignancies, outcomes in relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain poor. We previously showed that combination thioguanine (6TG) and decitabine (DEC) restores therapeutic efficacy in vitro in R/R AML (O'Dwyer K et al. Blood 2010;114:2657). Building on these observations, we completed a Phase I dose-escalation study of 6TG with DEC in advanced myeloid malignancies followed by a retrospective analysis of 42 patients treated with this regimen at our institution (Cicero KI et al. Blood 2019;134:3899). In this cohort, which included patients on- and off-study, responses were seen in 33% of patients, without a significant difference between patients who had or had not received prior HMA. This suggested that combination therapy with 6TG and DEC could overcome HMA resistance. We now present updated clinical and mechanistic data from an expanded cohort, including insights into regimen-specific effects on malignant clones and immune constitution. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed of all adult patients at our institution with advanced myeloid malignancies who received at least 1 cycle of 6TG and DEC between 2013-2025 with formal disease assessment evaluable by bone marrow biopsy or blood. The regimen utilized the maximum tolerated dose of 6TG identified in the phase I trial. Up to 2 cycles of induction with oral 6TG 80 mg/m2/day in 2 divided doses was given on Days 1-12. Decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV was given on Days 3-12. Following this, maintenance cycles consisted of 6TG on Days 1-7 and decitabine on Days 3-7 at the same doses. Treatment continued until the time of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), disease progression, or toxicity. The primary objective of this retrospective analysis was to determine the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in this population. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients were identified, 53% of whom were female, with a median age of 68 years (range, 23-86 years). Thirty-four patients (51%) had secondary AML, 26 (39%) had de novo AML, 5 (7%) had higher-risk MDS, and 2 (3%) had chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). By ELN2022 risk stratification among AML patients, 40 (60%), 6 (9%), 6 (9%), and 8 (12%) had adverse, intermediate, favorable, and unknown risk disease, respectively. Patients received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1-10). Eight (12%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 7 (10.5%) obtained a CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and 5 (7.5%) had morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), for an ORR of 30% (CR+CRi+MLFS). Nine of 20 responders (45%) had prior HMA exposure; 3 of these patients had exposure to prior HMA plus venetoclax. For the responders, the median PFS was 24 weeks (range, 7-NR), while the median OS was 50 weeks (range, 7-NR). For responders achieving composite CR (CRc: CR + CRi), median PFS was 35 weeks and median OS was 54 weeks. Two notable patients, one with CMML and another with relapsed AML, were bridged to allogeneic HSCT and are currently alive and in remission over 10 years after treatment. To elucidate response mechanisms, we performed methylome-aware whole-genome long-read sequencing and Pixelgen single-cell proteomic analysis. Pre-treatment samples from non-responders showed elevated CD44 co-localized with HLA and β2-microglobulin, while responders exhibited low CD44, uniform HLA/β2M expression, and expanded effector T-cell pools, suggesting immune activation as a key therapeutic axis. Post-treatment samples revealed persistent CD44 in non-responders, while responders expressed unexpectedly high CD36 expression in the context of re-emergence of normal stem cell marker expression. CONCLUSIONS: 6TG/DEC is a clinically active regimen in high-risk and R/R AML with a 30% ORR and favorable survival outcomes compared to historical controls. Single-cell proteomic data reveal immune-modulatory mechanisms that may underlie therapeutic response, offering a novel lens into resistance biology. Taken together, this combination remains a viable therapeutic option for elderly and unfit patients with high-risk and R/R AML who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. A phase II study of 6TG and decitabine-cedazuridine as an entirely oral regimen for R/R AML irrespective of molecular phenotype is in preparation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».