MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417020688 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-4868

Prothrombin complex concentrate in managing direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding and real-world use in vitamin k antagonist (VKA)-associated bleeding: The ongoing lex-210 and lex-212 studies

2025· article· en· W4417020688 sur OpenAlexaff
Ravi Sarode, Stephan Maack, Cristina Solomon, Sigurd Knaub, Dmitrii Matveev, Doris Hinterberger, Pierantonio Russo, Sam Schulman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProthrombin complex concentrateVitamin K antagonistInterim analysisDosingVitamin kOral anticoagulantCoagulationWarfarinMajor bleeding

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Significance: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) are approved for rapid reversal of acquired coagulation factor deficiency induced by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy in adult patients presenting with major bleeding or requiring urgent surgery. In addition to this approved use, 4F-PCCs are increasingly being used in other settings, including the management of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding when specific DOAC antidotes are unavailable. The LEX-210 study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of two dosing strategies for the 4F-PCC Balfaxar/Octaplex (Octapharma) in patients with DOAC-associated major bleeding (currently off-label in the US). Despite the increasing use of DOACs, including factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs), millions of patients in the US continue to receive VKA therapy. The LEX-212 study aims to assess the safety of Balfaxar vs. a comparator 4F-PCC (Kcentra/Beriplex, CSL Behring) for the urgent reversal of VKA-induced anticoagulation in real-world surgical settings, complementing evidence from clinical trials. Study Design and Methods: LEX-210 (NCT04867837) is a Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, group-sequential, parallel-group, adaptive design study with a preplanned interim analysis for potential sample size modification. Approximately 260 patients aged ≥18 years with acute major bleeding while on FXaI therapy will be randomized 1:1 to receive low-dose (15 IU/kg) or high-dose (50 IU/kg) 4F-PCC, with the aim to include at least 91 evaluable patients in each group in the full analysis set (FAS). Enrollment may continue as planned, be increased, or stopped based on an unblinded interim analysis from the first 30 evaluable patients in each group. Patients must have known or suspected baseline DOAC-specific anti-FXa activity of ≥100 ng/mL. Key exclusion criteria are patients with acute trauma for which reversal of FXaI alone would not be expected to control bleeding, and thromboembolic events (TEEs) within the prior 3 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients in whom 4F-PCC demonstrates hemostatic effectiveness within 24 hours after treatment, assessed by an Independent Data Monitoring and Endpoint Adjudication Committee using a binary outcome of ‘effective’ (rating of excellent or good) or ‘non-effective’ (rating of poor/none). The primary endpoint will be compared between groups using a one-sided z-test, adjusted for baseline anti-factor Xa activity as determined retrospectively by the central laboratory. Secondary endpoints include endogenous thrombin potential, TEEs, all-cause mortality, and adverse events through 30 days. LEX-212 (NCT06429787) is a post-marketing, multi-site, observational study enrolling an estimated 3,574 patients aged ≥18 years who received either Balfaxar or Kcentra for reversal of VKA-induced anticoagulation within 48 hours before urgent surgery or invasive procedure. Exclusion criteria are history of TEEs within 90 days before receiving VKA reversal therapy, and treatment with VKA reversal therapy but not undergoing urgent surgery or invasive procedure. Data will be obtained from electronic healthcare records of individual health systems, linked with administrative claims data as necessary. The primary endpoint, defined as the proportion of patients with TEEs within 45 days after treatment with either 4F-PCC, will be compared between groups using a Farrington-Manning test for relative risk, with a one-sided type I error of α = 0.025 and power of 1−β = 0.9. Secondary endpoints include TEE rates within 7 and 14 days, median time to TEE, and all-cause mortality within 7, 14, and 45 days post-treatment. Both studies comply with the Declaration of Helsinki. LEX-210 commenced in Q3 2021 and is ongoing at ~60 sites in North America and Europe, with more than 80 patients enrolled and treated to date; the study is expected to conclude in Q4 2026. LEX-212 is conducted in the US; the study started in Q1 2025 and has one site initiated and 14 patients enrolled so far, with the study end expected in Q2 2032. These studies will expand the understanding of 4F-PCCs in the context of anticoagulation reversal, with specific emphasis on hemostatic effectiveness in the currently off-label use of DOAC-associated bleeding (LEX-210) and rates of TEEs in the well-established indication of VKA reversal (LEX-212).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,113
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→