MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417020755 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-4278

Children and adolescents with sickle cell disease demonstrate improved health-related quality of life and low decisional regret after hematopoietic cell transplantation: A sickle cell transplant advocacy and research alliance (STAR) study

2025· article· en· W4417020755 sur OpenAlexaff
Gregory M.T. Guilcher, Jenny Duong, Stephen A. Sands, Araby Roberts, Scott Gillespie, Katie Liu, Staci D. Arnold, Jonathan Bardahl, Christine Camacho-Bydume, Emi Caywood, Ashley Chopek, Lev Gorfinkel, Ann E. Haight, John Horan, Monica L. Hulbert, Kimberly A. Kasow, Naresh Kumar, James L. LaBelle, Emily Riehm Meier, Alexander Ngwube, Robert Sheppard Nickel, Timothy S. Olson, Mahvish Q. Rahim, Akshay Sharma, Khaled Yassine, Elizabeth Stenger, Fiona Schulte

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuality of life (healthcare)RegretObservational studyInterimHematopoietic cellDiseaseTransplantationInterim analysisClinical trialExploratory research

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD) has steadily increased, however data on long-term effects is limited. Previous registry studies focused on survival, rejection and GVHD. Data on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) post-HCT in SCD is limited by small sample sizes and short follow-up. The objective of Project Sickle Cure (PSC) is to measure HRQoL and decisional regret (DR) in children with SCD, hypothesizing that HCT will improve HRQoL longitudinally with low rates of DR. PSC is a prospective observational multicenter study of SCD participants undergoing allogeneic HCT. Since 2021, 15 STAR sites in North America have enrolled 89 participants, with 65 having >6 mo post-HCT follow-up and included in this analysis. Baseline demographics, disease, and HCT characteristics were collected and summarized. Participants and their primary caregivers complete HRQoL measures (PedsQL Generic Core [GC], PedsQL Family Impact Module [FIM], and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) measures alongside a new DR Scale (DRS; higher scores indicate greater regret). Data are collected pre-HCT and post-HCT at 30, 90, and 180 days (d) and 1, 2, and 3 years (yrs). General linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate preliminary changes over time. Results are presented as least-square means (LSM) and differences in least-square means (ΔLSM) from baseline. In this interim exploratory analysis, no statistical adjustments to p-values (e.g., alpha spending or corrections for multiple testing) were applied; results may differ after full enrollment and completion of planned analyses. Mean duration of follow up was 2.3 yrs (SD=1.0), with 85% >1 yr post-HCT. Participants were 46% male with mean age at HCT of 10.1 yrs (SD=5.3). Most had HbSS genotype (94%), and disease severity was severe, less severe, and mild in 35%, 35%, and 30%, respectively. Donor was matched related in 75%, bone marrow graft source in 68%, and conditioning was myeloablative in 53%, reduced intensity in 38%, and nonmyeloablative in 9%. Acute GVHD of any severity was reported in 34%, and any chronic GVHD in 5%. Many participantshad significant improvement from baseline in multiple domains of HRQoL, some with sustained improvement and from the earliest timepoint. For PedsQL GC, patient (pt) and parent-proxy HRQoL significantly increased from LSM=71.7 and 73.7 at baseline starting d 180 and 1 yr to 78.3 and 81.2 by yr 2, respectively (pt ΔLSM (95% CI)=6.6 (0.6,12.6), p=.032; parent-proxy ΔLSM (95% CI)=7.5 (0.1,14.9), p=.046). For PedsQL FIM, parent-reported total family functioning significantly increased from baseline of LSM=76.3 to 88.3 starting d 180 to yr 3 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=12.1 (2.9, 21.2), p=.011). Patient PROMIS scores significantly improved from baseline for anxiety (starting d 30) and fatigue up to yr 1 (anxiety ΔLSM (95% CI) =-6.0 (-10.5,-1.5), p=.009; fatigue ΔLSM (95% CI)=-6.8 (-12.4,-1.2), p=.019), as well as mobility from yr 2 to yr 3 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=7.2 (0.3,14.1), p=.040) and pain interference from yr 1 up to yr 2 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=-7.9 (-14.8, -1.0), p=.024). Parent-proxy scores significantly improved from baseline up to yr 3 for anxiety (from d 180; ΔLSM (95% CI)=-8.6 (-15.4,-1.8), p=.013), fatigue (from 1 yr; ΔLSM (95% CI)=-9.2 (-16.1,-2.3), p=.009), mobility (from yr 2; ΔLSM (95% CI)=6.6 (1.3,12.0), p=.016), and pain interference (from d 90; ΔLSM (95% CI)=-11.0 (-17.8,-4.2), p=.002). Pt and parent-proxy depression did not significantly differ from baseline. Though pt peer relationship scores significantly decreased from baseline to d 180 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=-4.8 (-9.1,-0.4),p=.031), all scores remained above cut-off for impairment. For DRS, pt and parent-proxy scores indicated low regret up to yr 3 (LSM=17.5 and 11.2, respectively), which did not significantly differ from baseline at d 90. Most PROMIS HRQoL scores were normal pre-HCT in our cohort. Previous studies with smaller sample sizes have demonstrated both low and high baseline scores. However, it is the favourable change from baseline which is of greater relevance to patients and providers. In conclusion, our interim analysis demonstrated significant improvements in multiple domains of HRQoL at longitudinal timepoints, as early as 30 d and lasting up to 3 yrs post-HCT with low DR. Our findings are strengthened by our large cohort, duration of follow-up and the use of diverse measures, including a novel DRS.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207