MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417103507 · doi:10.1007/s13555-025-01595-9

Bimekizumab Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Results from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE BRIGHT

2025· article· en· W4417103507 sur OpenAlexaff
April W. Armstrong, Kim Papp, Mark Lebwohl, L. Savage, Keiichi Yamanaka, Diana Elena Vlase, Rhys Warham, Jérémy Lambert, José M. López Pinto, Krista Wixted, Diamant Thaçi

Notice bibliographique

RevueDermatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Établissements canadiensProbity Medical ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesUCB Pharma
Mots-clésMEDLINEPopulationFeature (linguistics)Component (thermodynamics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

While bimekizumab has demonstrated rapid, superior clinical efficacy versus adalimumab and ustekinumab, with sustained responses through 4 years, its comparative and long-term impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains underexplored. Here, we report PROs with bimekizumab versus adalimumab/ustekinumab/placebo in phase 3 controlled trials, and over 4 years with bimekizumab. Data were analyzed from BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY (52/56 weeks), and their open-label extension (OLE), BE BRIGHT (144 weeks; 4 years’ total treatment). Patients were randomized to bimekizumab/adalimumab/ustekinumab/placebo during comparator-controlled periods; all received bimekizumab during BE BRIGHT. Proportions of patients reporting Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P‑SIM) = 0 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) = 0 (both at item-level) were assessed during comparator‑controlled periods using non-responder imputation (NRI). Over 4 years, PROs were analyzed using modified NRI in patients who received continuous bimekizumab from baseline into the OLE. BE SURE included 478 patients (bimekizumab, 319; adalimumab, 159); BE VIVID included 567 (bimekizumab, 321; ustekinumab, 163; placebo, 83); BE READY included 435 (bimekizumab, 349; placebo, 86). In total, 771 patients received continuous bimekizumab into the OLE. A larger proportion of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved P-SIM = 0 across key items versus adalimumab (week 24; itching, 30.7% vs. 18.9%; skin pain, 43.9% vs. 30.2%; scaling, 39.2% vs. 19.5%), ustekinumab (week 16; itching, 31.2% vs. 17.8%; skin pain, 51.7% vs. 27.6%; scaling, 43.6% vs. 17.2%), and placebo. Similar trends were seen for other P-SIM items and in proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients reporting DLQI = 0 across items versus comparators. The patient-reported benefits of bimekizumab were demonstrated throughout the OLE, with 65.5–94.8% of patients reporting DLQI = 0 across items at 4 years. Bimekizumab provided greater improvements in PROs versus comparators, with durable effects over 4 years. These findings reinforce bimekizumab’s role in effective psoriasis management, linking clinical efficacy with sustained patient-reported benefits. NCT03412747, NCT03370133, NCT03410992, NCT03598790. A Graphical Abstract is available for this article. Psoriasis is a long-lasting condition causing red, scaly skin patches that itch and hurt. As psoriasis symptoms affect daily life, finding treatments that work well and provide lasting improvements is important. While most studies report outcomes observed by physicians, we focused on patient-reported outcomes, exploring how psoriasis impacts were experienced and described by patients. Bimekizumab is an injection for psoriasis that works by lowering the activity of two proteins involved in causing inflammation. Several studies have been conducted to assess how well it controls psoriasis. The studies (BE SURE, BE VIVID, and BE READY) compared bimekizumab to other treatments (adalimumab and ustekinumab) and placebo over periods ranging from 16 to 52 weeks. These studies fed into a long-term study called BE BRIGHT, which followed patients for an additional 3 years to see if bimekizumab’s benefits lasted. In these studies, patients recorded how severe their psoriasis signs and symptoms were during the past day and how much psoriasis affected their lives over the past week, using two questionnaires. They completed these before their first injection and at different points throughout the studies. We examined the results to see how well bimekizumab worked, both versus other treatments, and over 4 years. The results showed that bimekizumab worked better than other treatments at reducing bothersome signs and symptoms like itching, pain, and scaling, and improving quality of life. Over 4 years, patients who took bimekizumab continued to experience a better quality of life. Overall, patients with psoriasis experienced strong, lasting benefits with bimekizumab.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDermatology and TherapyMême sujetPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisTravaux en français237 207