Outcomes of people living with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received inotuzumab ozogamicin before a stem cell transplant: a plain language summary
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Plain Language SummaryWhat is this summary about?This summary describes results from a real-world study that looked at people with a type of blood cancer called acute lymphoblastic leukemia (also known as ALL). People in the study received a medicine called inotuzumab ozogamicin (also known as inotuzumab) and then received a stem cell transplant for their ALL. Researchers looked at how long people in the study lived after their transplant and how many people died for reasons related and unrelated to relapse. They also looked at how many people developed side effects, including a potentially life-threatening condition called veno-occlusive disease or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (also known as VOD/SOS).What were the results?Over half the people (54%) in this study were alive 18 months after their transplant. Around 2 in 10 (22%) people died within 18 months of their transplant from reasons unrelated to relapse, and around 2 in 10 (24%) people died from reasons related to relapse.Around 1 in 10 (14%) people in this study developed VOD/SOS within 100 days of their transplant. People who received two medicines called alkylators to prepare them for their transplant were more likely to develop VOD/SOS than those who did not.What do the results mean?In this real-world study, the proportion of people with ALL who developed VOD/SOS after taking inotuzumab and receiving a stem cell transplant was similar to what has been observed in clinical trials. However, fewer people in this real-world study died from reasons unrelated to relapse than in clinical trials. People who received two medicines called alkylators to prepare them for their stem cell transplant were more likely to develop VOD/SOS.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».