MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417106330 · doi:10.1108/mgrj-06-2012-0002

Guest Editors’ Introduction

2012· article· en· W4417106330 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bogum Yoon, Francine Falk-Ross

Notice bibliographique

RevueMiddle Grades Research Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCritical Race Theory in Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMulticulturalismRedressMulticultural educationImmigrationEthnic groupRacismDiversity (politics)Inclusion (mineral)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Multicultural education has a long history in the United States which was stemmed from the civil rights movements of 1960s. The discussion on race and ethnicity had originally focused on the African American population, and was spearheaded by African American scholars including James Banks, Geneva Gay, and Carl Grant in 1970s (Ramsey, 2008). However, the discussion on race and ethnicity in the beginning of multicultural education gradually broadened its topic by including class, gender, sexual orientation, and disabilities. Currently, due to the large influx of immigrant students in the United States, the issue of language diversity increasingly became an important topic in multicultural education. Whichever topic multicultural education has dealt with, its main focus has always been to redress systemic inequities, ensuring individuals’ educational equities based on social justice.In this special-themed issue—multicultural education in middle grade settings—we aim to address these equity issues through four selective scholarly articles. All of these articles are based on the studies that were conducted in classroom or school settings. Although multicultural education became a pressing topic in the educational field, it has not been widely discussed in middle grade settings. Therefore, as editors of this special issue, we are pleased to offer this opportunity to middle school educators and researchers to critically examine the issues of multicultural education. More specifically, the first article, “Storylines: Listening to Immigrant Students, Teachers, and Cultural-Bridge Persons Making Sense of Classroom Interactions” by Martha Strickland, follows the caring and nurturing efforts of teachers and cultural-bridge persons as they interact with newly arrived middle-level students. The implications of these storylines are important for middle-grade educators to further understand multicultural education in schools. The second article, “Critical Pedagogy With the Oppressed and the Oppressors: Middle School Students Discuss Racism and White Privilege” by Jill Flynn, examines the conversations between White students and students of color as they engaged in a unit of study on cultural conflict and resolution. Their comments and those of their White teachers provide insight into multicultural education approaches. In the third article by Ellis Hurd, the topic of mixed heritage is investigated through a case study of the in- and out-of-school experiences of one middle level student and his close-in-age siblings. Hurd considers the contradictory relationship between assimilation and achievement for these students in “A Framework for Understanding Multicultural Identities: An Investigation of a Middle Level Student’s French-Canadian Honduran-American (Mestizo) Identity.” Finally, Mikel Cole, Kelly Puzio, Christopher Keyes, Robert Jiménez, Lisa Pray, and Samuel David document and describe the results of an intervention study focused on English language learners and the plurality of language orientations that influence policy. In their research article titled, “Contesting Language Orientations: A Critical Multicultural Perspective on Local Language Policy in Two Middle Schools,” the authors discuss the implications for students and educators in school classrooms.As editors, we anticipate the featured research articles play important roles for educators to reflect on current practice and research and act to “liberate” middle school students from the constraint of inequities through facilitation of educational equality and equity. According to Paolo Freire (1970), social actions are necessary for implementing critical multicultural education. As the current multicultural education which was influenced by the work of Freire takes a more critical stance, we believe that these four articles reflect that stance. Rather than following the concept of “banking” education (Freire, 1970) which focuses on the teacher’s role as a knowledge transmitter by positioning the student as a knowledge receiver, the four articles suggest an important message that educators play a role to liberate students by respecting their multiple identities.Many scholars and colleagues have provided crucial support for this special issue. We express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback for the publication of this issue. Their contribution made this theme issue possible. Moreover, our special thanks extend to Dr. David L. Hough, managing editor and Dr. Vicki L. Schmitt, editor-in-chief of the Middle Grade Research Journal, for accepting our suggestion on multicultural education as a special theme issue. We appreciate that they share the importance of the topic of multicultural education in middle grade settings with us. Additionally, we express our gratitude to our graduate assistants, Jerome Amaechi and Marianne Lawson for their editing work.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,320
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,193
Tête enseignante GPT0,492
Écart entre enseignants0,299 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMiddle Grades Research JournalMême sujetCritical Race Theory in EducationTravaux en français237 207