Supporting Recovery College trainers: a qualitative study on complementary knowledge in Quebec and Lombardy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Recovery Colleges (RCs) are educational centers offering free courses on mental health, well-being, recovery, and living well together. They represent an innovative approach to mental health, going beyond clinical and therapeutic interventions to foster constructive dialogue between people with lived experience and professionals with theoretical or clinical knowledge. Fidelity to the RC model, particularly to the principle of co-production, is considered essential to ensure quality. However, despite the crucial role of trainers for maintaining alignment with RC principles and values, little research has examined how trainers could be trained and supported to coproduce RC courses. This study aimed to explore the experiences of RC trainers and coordinators, describing challenges and good practices encountered in working with complementary types of knowledge. Methods: A qualitative exploratory multicenter design was adopted. Data were collected between May and December 2024 through five online focus groups involving trainers and coordinators from two RCs, one in Quebec, Canada, and one in Lombardy, Italy. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using a stepwise thematic analysis. Results: Twenty-seven people with diverse backgrounds participated in the study. Eight main themes (and their respective subthemes) emerged from participants' narratives: the distinctive nature of the RC model which requires the embodiment of its values; the development of core competencies such as knowledge integration, mobilization of experiential knowledge, and group facilitation skills; the dynamic within the trainers' dyads, described as a relational process based on mutual trust and negotiation; strengths and challenges of the co-production process within the dyad and with learners; ongoing activities and tools to ensure trainers' alignment with the model and activities to support the trainer's role. Discussion: Results suggest the importance of raising awareness among trainers about relevant elements to be considered in designing and implementing a RC training program. It is therefore important to foster egalitarian and supportive relationships in the trainers' dyad, as these can serve as a model for co-production during RC courses. Finally, to improve knowledge complementarity, trainers need to receive continuous support, through ongoing training activities and other learning opportunities to ensure alignment with value and principles of RC model.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».