MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417182446 · doi:10.1111/ijd.70194

Combined Low Dose Oral Minoxidil and Immunomodulator Efficacy and Safety in Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4417182446 sur OpenAlexaff
Eric McMullen, Sana Gupta, Michelle Pham, Daniel Rayner, Cathryn Sibbald, Jeffrey Donovan, Arash Mostaghimi

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Dermatology · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHair Growth and Disorders
Établissements canadiensWestern UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of OttawaSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTofacitinibAdverse effectJanus kinase inhibitorMinoxidilCohortNeutropeniaCritical appraisalDysgeusia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Many practitioners elect to add low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) to various systemic immunomodulatory agents, including Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), in hopes of improving treatment outcomes in patients with alopecia areata (AA). This systematic review aims to document, synthesize, and critically appraise the current literature on combination LDOM and systemic immunomodulators for the management of AA. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to April 22, 2025, using subject headings and key terms relevant to oral minoxidil and AA. A PROSPERO protocol was registered (CRD420250651072), and PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines were followed [1]. Eligible studies consisted of those reporting the safety and efficacy of concurrent LDOM and systemic immunomodulators in patients with AA. Abstracts, non-English texts, and reviews were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists [2], revealing a ten-to-nine split between low/moderate risk (https://doi.org/10.17632/xdgfrxw54s.1). Nineteen studies (ten case reports/series, nine cohort studies), encompassing 388 patients with AA who received concurrent LDOM with systemic immunomodulators, were identified, of whom 54.4% were female with a mean age of 29.9 years (range: 3–87) (Table 1; Table S1 https://doi.org/10.17632/xdgfrxw54s.1). The most frequently studied immunomodulator combined with LDOM was oral tofacitinib (209/388, 54%), followed by oral baricitinib (152/388, 39%). Tofacitinib was commonly administered at 5 mg BID, and baricitinib at 4 mg OD. Mean follow-up duration was 16 months (range: 6–44). In studies clearly reporting adverse events, patients experienced hypercholesterolemia (19/145, 13.1%), transaminitis (15/145, 10.3%), hypertrichosis (10/145, 6.9%), neutropenia (7/145, 4.8%), and elevated creatinine (4/145, 2.8%), among others (Table 1). Complete hair regrowth (defined as a SALT of 0) was reported with LDOM and oral tofacitinib (16/32, 50.0%), or with oral corticosteroids plus azathioprine or cyclosporine (7/11, 63.6%), dupilumab (2/3, 66.7%), or ritlecitinib (0/1, 0%). Two studies explicitly compared dual therapy (mini-pulse dexamethasone or tofacitinib with LDOM) to systemic monotherapy, and reported non-significant SALT score differences (p = 0.88, p = 0.62) [3, 4]. Adverse events were either non-significant (p = 0.65) [4] or not reported between dual and monotherapy groups [3]. In this cohort, SALT ≤ 20 was achieved in 71.4% (60/84) of patients receiving LDOM and any JAKi (mean follow-up 22.2 months, n = 58) (Table 2). This is significantly higher than the 36.8%–40.9% of patients treated with 4 mg baricitinib monotherapy in the BRAVE-AA1/AA2 trials who achieved a SALT ≤ 20 at Week 52 (Z = 4.95, p < 0.00001) [5], though this comparison is imperfect. Due to limited consistent reporting on definitions of complete response, a sub-analysis of SALT ≤ 20 scores could not be performed. With incomplete reporting on LDOM dosing, a dose response effect of LDOM could not be determined. Combination LDOM-JAKi therapy may improve JAKi efficacy, but data to support this remain relatively weak at the present time. Despite these promising findings, current evidence is limited by small sample sizes and potential publication bias. Future studies should prioritize larger studies, extended follow-up periods, and refined patient selection criteria. A randomized controlled trial comparing LDOM monotherapy to combination LDOM-JAKi treatment groups is needed to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in AA. The authors have nothing to report. No AI was used in the writing of this manuscript. C.S. has received honoraria from Abbvie, Leo, Pfizer, Miravo, Novartis, UCB, Sanofi/Regeneron unrelated to this work. J.D. has received honoraria from Pfizer and Vichy, has participated on advisory boards at Pfizer for payment, has received royalties from UpToDate, participates on the Board of Directors for the Scarring Alopecia Foundation, and is the active Director of the Evidence Based Hair Training Program. A.M. has received honoraria or consulting fees from hims and hers, AbbVie, Sun Pharma, Pfizer, Digital Diagnostics, Lilly, Equillium, ASLAN, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermatheory, Olaplex, Legacy Healthcare, and Pelage. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,058
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,899

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,337
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of DermatologyMême sujetHair Growth and DisordersTravaux en français237 207