2025 Canadian Surgery Forum01. Survey of Canadian surgeons’ attitudes toward medical assistance in dying (MAiD)02. Cholecystectomy-related complaints: a 20-year review of the Canadian medicolegal experience03. Endoscope-assisted in situ lower limb arterial reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study04. Comparing postoperative healthcare utilization between immigrants and non-immigrants undergoing emergency general surgery in British Columbia05. Benefits, barriers, and feasibility of semi-urgent surgical programs: a scoping review06. Transversus abdominus plane block versus port site anesthetic in laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta analysis07. Use of artificial intelligence versus traditional statistical modelling in predicting anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a scoping review08. Randomized controlled trial comparing water infusion to air insufflation during colonoscope insertion by surgical trainees09. Can appendectomy be safely delayed? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies comparing emergent versus delayed appendectomy in adult patients10. Developing and implementing a novel planetary health menu for a tertiary care hospital11. International consensus on global surgery learning objectives and competencies12. General surgeons’ perspectives on post-discharge opioid prescribing: a qualitative study13. Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer and association with survival outcomes14. The public–private trade-off: evaluating Alberta’s use of private surgical facilities15. Association of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and ethnic diversity with failure to rescue in curative-intent colorectal cancer surgery: a population-based cohort study16. Benchmarking colorectal cancer surgical outcomes in Nova Scotia against an international cohort17. Implementation of Competence by Design in Canadian general surgery training: program director perspectives18. Evaluation of quality-of-life outcomes in bariatric surgery: a systematic review01. Machine learning–based analysis of key factors influencing operating room efficiency in thoracic surgery02. Is segmentectomy or wedge resection appropriate for stage IB non–small cell lung cancer ≤ 2 cm with visceral pleural invasion?03. Predicting local recurrence after segmentectomy for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer04. Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus perioperative chemotherapy for esophageal and esophagogastric adenocarcinoma — a single-centre experience05. Contralateral pulmonary resection after lobectomy in non–small cell lung cancer: a retrospective review of results and predictors of complications06. Assessing the impact of multicentre positive deviance seminar on length of stay following lobectomy: an interrupted time series analysis07. Perioperative outcomes of lung cancer surgery in women: a Canadian nationwide retrospective cohort study01. Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer02. Overall survival of metastatic appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma: a contemporary population-based study03. Patient perspective: decisional factors for ileoanal pouch versus permanent ileostomy after emergency colectomy for ulcerative colitis04. Experiences and results of a Canadian colorectal robotic surgery program: the first 5 years05. Turning the tide: a sustainable future for endoscopic water use06. The impact of preoperative colonoscopy for appendiceal mucinous neoplasms07. Evaluating patient selection for surgery in older patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer in Ontario: a population-based cohort study08. Impact of a patient-centred program for low anterior resection syndrome: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial09. Outcomes after total neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer with resectable distant metastasis10. Preferences and priorities of care of patients with colorectal cancer across the age spectrum11. ChatGPT: a useful adjunct but not a substitute for clinician expertise in educating patients on low anterior resection syndrome12. Patient, provider, and institutional factors associated with wait time benchmarks for colorectal cancer surgery: a population-based cross-sectional study13. Analysis of complication rate in patients with rectal cancer with discrepant magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging14. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer in Canada15. Comparison of BioLIFT versus LIFT for the treatment of trans-sphincteric anal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis01. Outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and liver-directed therapy for synchronous peritoneal and liver metastatic colorectal cancer — a systematic review with meta-analysis02. Validation of the PACS score for predicting postoperative hypotension after adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: analysis of 2192 cases across
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aucun résumé. Ce n'est pas une lacune de cette base de données : OpenAlex n'en a pas non plus. 23,3 % de la base est dans cet état, et le tri y repère MOITIÉ moins de métarecherche ; l'absence est donc un biais mesuré, et non un champ manquant.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,300 | 0,086 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».