Abstract IA003: Trends in cancer mortality in young adults in selected upper-middle and high-income countries with focus on colorectal cancer: an update to 2026.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract An increasing incidence, but also mortality, from colorectal cancer (CRC) in young adults, i.e. in more recent generations, has been reported in several high-income countries over the last decade. We updated trends in cancer mortality in 15 countries (plus the EU) and predicted the number of deaths and rates for 2026, with focus on CRC. We analysed mortality data from the WHO dataset at age 25–49 in the 15 most populous upper-middle and high-income countries providing valid data from 1990 to 2022 or the latest available year – plus the EU. We derived population estimates from the UN World Population Prospects database. We computed age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR, world standard) for all cancers combined and for the most common sites in young adults (colorectum, lung, pancreas and breast). For CRC, we also computed ASMR for the 30–39 age group. We compared the ASMRs around 2020 with those around 2010. We performed a Joinpoint regression on all cancers combined and on the most common sites, over the period 1990-2022. We predicted the number of deaths for 2026 based on a log-linear regression model applied on the most recent segment identified through Poisson Joinpoint regression. Around 2020, the highest overall cancers rates were in Latin America and Eastern Europe (over 35/100,000 females, 25/100,000 males), while the lowest ones were in the Republic of Korea, Canada, and Japan (below 20/100,100 in both sexes). Between 2010 and 2020, all countries showed declines in total cancer mortality (by 10% to above 25% in both sexes), except Mexico and Argentina for females. However, CRC mortality increased appreciably in the UK (by about 30%) and in Northern and most Latin America (by about 10%), though it declined in most Europe, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. When the analysis was restricted to the 30–39 age group, i.e. the generation born in the 1980’s, substantial increases in CRC mortality were observed over the last decade in the UK, North and Latin America, and Australia, and to a lesser extent in Europe and Japan. Mortality tended to decrease for pancreatic and to a greater extent for lung and breast cancer in most countries. Thus, overall cancer mortality in young adults declined in the countries considered. This is mainly due to tobacco control for lung - with substantial declines proportionally similar for both sexes - and pancreatic cancer, as well as for other tobacco-related neoplasms. Improved diagnosis and treatment had a key role on favourable trends of breast cancer and several other neoplasms common in young adults. However, CRC mortality in young adults increased in several, but not all, countries considered. The increase was proportionally greater at age 30-39, i.e. among the generation born in the 1980’s compared to that born in the late 1970’s. The rising CRC mortality rate can be due to the increased prevalence of overweight, obesity, and consequently diabetes, but other (dietary) factors may be involved. This therefore deserves continued attention. Citation Format: Carlo La Vecchia, Silvia Mignozzi, Claudia Santucci. Trends in cancer mortality in young adults in selected upper-middle and high-income countries with focus on colorectal cancer: an update to 2026. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr IA003.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».