The Influence of Regional Elites on the Optimization of Intraregional Space in a Federal State
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The relevance of this study stems from the need to find effective models for managing spatial development in federal states, where balancing the interests of the center and the regions is a key challenge. Despite the extensive body of research devoted to various aspects of federalism, the influence of regional elites on spatial optimization processes in rapidly changing political and economic conditions remains underexplored. This article aims to identify the key factors, mechanisms, and models of regional elite influence on spatial development policy in a federal state. The study utilizes a combination of methods: historical and genetic analysis to identify the evolution of the role of elites, an institutional approach to studying the formal and informal practices of their interaction with the center, and a comparative analysis to compare case studies from the Russian Federation, the United States, Germany, Canada, Brazil, and Nigeria. The empirical basis of the study is comprised of sources including federal and regional regulatory acts, statistical data, analytical reports from governmental and non-governmental organizations, as well as materials from scientific conferences and publications in specialized journals. The study revealed that regional elites exert a dual influence on the spatial development of federal states. On the one hand, they can act as drivers of innovation, initiators of promising projects, and “growth points” contributing to increased regional competitiveness and improved quality of life. On the other hand, regional elites often become a source of conservatism, hindering necessary reforms and supporting outdated economic models. Furthermore, the clash of interests between various regional elites can lead to conflicts that hinder the implementation of national goals and objectives. Key factors determining the effectiveness of regional elites’ influence on spatial development include the mechanisms for their integration into decision-making systems (including party and advisory ones), the incentive system for regional leaders aimed at encouraging innovation and attracting investment, and the degree of elite circulation between the center and the regions, which ensures the exchange of experience and the dissemination of best management practices. The scientific novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive interdisciplinary analysis of the role of regional elites through the prism of three methodological approaches. The results of the study can be used by federal and regional authorities to improve interaction mechanisms, as well as by scholars and experts in the field of federalism and regional policy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».