Assessing Cognitive Function over Time in Patients with Refractory Chronic Migraine Who Received Ketamine Infusions: A Prospective, Observational Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ketamine infusions are used in the inpatient setting for refractory chronic migraine but are associated with neurotoxicity in rodents at high doses and memory deficits in illicit users. The relationship between ketamine infusions and cognitive function in refractory chronic migraine patients after infusions is unknown. We aimed to determine if patients receiving ketamine infusions for refractory chronic migraine experience changes in cognitive function as assessed by the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Adults 18 years or older who were diagnosed with refractory chronic migraine and met criteria for hospitalization with an elective ketamine infusion were recruited for this prospective observational study. All patients had Migraine Disability Assessment grade IV (severe disability) and had previously failed an inpatient treatment with at least one other intravenous infusion. Baseline assessments included current and average pain levels, monthly migraine days, depression history, medications, and initial assessments of the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Migraine Disability Assessment, and Headache Impact Test-6. Patients were admitted to a dedicated headache unit within 1 month of baseline assessments to undergo a 5-day continuous ketamine infusion to a maximum rate of 1 mg/kg/h. The aforementioned assessments were then repeated at 1, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was the change over time in the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which was analyzed using generalized estimating equations adjusted for age and sex. A total of 23 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 44.8 $$\pm$$ 11.5 years, and 87% were female. A history of depression was present in 82.6%. The estimated marginal mean telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment score changed from 18.8 $$\pm$$ 0.7 to 19.9 $$\pm$$ 0.7 at 1 month (p < 0.001), 19.2 $$\pm$$ 0.8 at 6 months (p = 0.390), and 18.3 $$\pm$$ 0.9 at 12 months (p = 0.382). Only the change at 1 month reached the minimal clinically important difference of 1 point. Monthly migraine days decreased from a baseline of 27.1 $$\pm$$ 1.6 to 24.4 $$\pm$$ 2.1 at 1 month (p = 0.08), 22.4 $$\pm$$ 2.3 at 6 months (p = 0.05), and 22.3 $$\pm$$ 2.2 at 12 months (p = 0.026). The study suggests that measurable cognitive impairment did not occur over the course of the 1-year study period in most patients with refractory chronic migraine after receiving a ketamine infusion. However, a few patients experienced worsening telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, and furthermore, the small sample size and lack of a control group prevent any definitive conclusions. Larger follow-up studies would further establish the safety of ketamine treatment in headache or pain.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».