Comparison of multispectral singlet oxygen luminescence dosimetry and singlet oxygen explicit dosimetry in artificial phantom
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
SignificanceDirect detection of singlet-state oxygen (O12) is a critical objective in Type II photodynamic therapy (PDT) due to its pivotal role in mediating therapeutic effects. Although multispectral singlet oxygen dosimetry (MSOLD) has demonstrated the capability to detect O12 luminescence both in vitro and in vivo, there remains no standardized method for accurately quantifying reactive singlet oxygen, [O2]rx1, based on these measured signals. By contrast, the singlet oxygen explicit dosimetry (SOED) model offers a robust framework for calculating [O2]rx1. Demonstrating that O12 luminescence obtained through MSOLD can reliably quantify [O2]rx1, as achieved by the SOED model, is essential for advancing the accuracy and applicability of PDT dosimetry.AimWe aim to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of MSOLD in quantifying O12 concentrations from measured O12 luminescence in benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD)-mediated PDT. The performance of MSOLD is assessed by comparing its results with those derived from the SOED model.ApproachA continuous-wave 690 nm laser was used to excite a nanoparticle formulation of BPD, tradename Visudyne® in methanol at varying concentrations (2 to 6 mg/L). The singlet oxygen luminescence was measured using an InGaAs spectrometer and analyzed using a singular value decomposition algorithm. Near-infrared singlet oxygen emission at ∼1270 nm was extracted as O12 luminescence. Real-time singlet oxygen spectra were collected over 900 s using a 1.5 mm diameter fiber optic. Ground-state oxygen concentration was measured with a commercial oxygen probe, photosensitizer concentration was determined with a custom-made contact probe, and photon fluence rate was assessed with an isotropic detector. [O2]rx1 was then calculated based on the SOED model.ResultsThe extracted singlet oxygen (O12) luminescence exhibited clear concentration-dependent trends, with higher BPD concentrations producing stronger O12 luminescence. Over time, the O12 luminescence decayed due to photosensitizer bleaching. In addition, a strong linear correlation was observed between the O12 luminescence measured via MSOLD and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentrations calculated using the SOED model. We also investigated the impact of tissue optical properties on singlet oxygen luminescence detection and developed correction factors to account for their variations.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that singlet oxygen (O12) detected through MSOLD can reliably quantify ROS concentrations in BPD-mediated PDT with accuracy comparable to the SOED model, which requires separate measurements of light fluence rate, photosensitizer concentration, and oxygen availability, followed by modeling to estimate the amount of reactive singlet oxygen. By contrast, MSOLD can also be a more cost-effective, simpler, and faster alternative to SOED as it directly measures the singlet oxygen luminescence to quantify reactive singlet oxygen. Under appropriate correction for tissue optical properties, MSOLD presents a promising, robust, and direct dosimetry solution for clinical PDT applications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».