MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417420156 · doi:10.52320/svv.v1ix.400

PROFESINIS PERDEGIMAS DIETISTŲ PROFESINĖJE VEIKLOJE: IŠŠŪKIŲ IR PATIRČIŲ DIMENSIJOS

2025· article· W4417420156 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laimutė Kardelienė, Sigutė Ežerskienė

Notice bibliographique

RevueSTUDIJOS – VERSLAS – VISUOMENĖ DABARTIS IR ATEITIES ĮŽVALGOS · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBurnoutEmotional exhaustionAffect (linguistics)BureaucracyLithuanianPerceptionQualitative researchHealth care

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The article addresses professional burnout among dietitians in the Lithuanian healthcare system through qualitative research using in-depth interviews. It explores the multidimensional nature of burnout, highlighting individual experiences and systemic challenges. The study reveals five core causes of burnout among dietitians: the undervaluation and low status of the profession, emotional exhaustion, a gap between study content and real work practice, lack of collegial support combined with competition, and the search for meaningfulness and motivation in their work. These factors collectively affect dietitians’ health and work quality, emphasizing the urgent need to improve study programs, workplace conditions, and societal perceptions of dietitians. The findings align with international research, underscoring burnout as both an individual and systemic phenomenon requiring comprehensive preventive measures and workplace improvements. Burnout is contextualized as a psychological condition marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced professional accomplishment, previously well-documented among healthcare workers like doctors and nurses, but underexplored in dietitians. The multifaceted roles dietitians play—from nutritional counselling to managing financial and organizational duties—increase psychological strain, further exacerbated by inadequate recognition and support. International surveys show high burnout prevalence among dietitians, linked to heavy workloads and lack of professional appreciation. The research methodology involved deep interviews with five Lithuanian dietitians with diverse institutional backgrounds and work experience over three years. The data were analyzed thematically to uncover subjective experiences and emotions related to burnout and professional satisfaction. Key challenges emerged, including professional isolation, financial insecurity, high workloads, bureaucratic barriers, and client misunderstandings driven by misinformation. Participants expressed that professional fulfilment largely stems from witnessing clients’ positive nutritional changes, gaining trust, and contributing meaningfully to public health education. However, work satisfaction is compromised by systemic issues like unclear professional status in medical settings, insufficient practical training in educational programs, and a competitive, sometimes unsupportive work environment. The study highlights a mismatch between academic preparation and workplace realities, with calls for more practical, client-interaction-focused training and enhanced teamwork skills. Emotional exhaustion is described as a significant drain, aggravated by individual work settings and minimal institutional backing. The study reflects similar findings from Canadian and Australian research, pointing to high emotional distress linked with understaffing, inadequate leadership support, and complex interdisciplinary interactions. These conditions threaten the continuity and quality of nutritional care, as frequent staff turnover disrupts patient services. The article underscores the importance of societal and institutional recognition of dietitians’ roles, which remain insufficiently defined and appreciated in Lithuania, affecting morale and career development prospects. Participants noted that the dietitian’s role is often misunderstood or diminished to food preparation tasks, leading to professional devaluation. They also face outdated or excessive academic curricula not aligned with real-world skills needs. Addressing these systemic gaps is crucial for improving professional well-being and reducing burnout risk. The research also discusses the emotional labour inherent in dietetics, where resistance or misinformation from clients about nutrition imposes psychological stress. This emotional dimension ties closely to client interaction dynamics, which can either support professional satisfaction or fuel burnout when clients are unreceptive or hostile toward recommended dietary changes. Lastly, the article points to international systematic reviews and meta-analyses highlighting the severity of emotional burnout in dietitians globally, advocating for standardized burnout definitions and assessment tools specific to this profession. It emphasizes the need for interventions tailored to sociocultural and educational contexts to enhance the resilience and sustainability of dietetics professionals. In conclusion, the article argues for multi-level actions to combat burnout among dietitians in Lithuania, including improving educational content, enhancing interprofessional collaboration, fostering collegial support, refining professional identity and status, and providing institutional and societal backing. Such steps will help maintain dietitians’ emotional health, professional motivation, and effectiveness in delivering high-quality nutritional care, which ultimately benefits public health outcomes. This comprehensive exploration adds valuable insight to an under-researched but critical issue in healthcare workforce sustainability and well-being.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,379
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,002
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,402
Écart entre enseignants0,350 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSTUDIJOS – VERSLAS – VISUOMENĖ DABARTIS IR ATEITIES ĮŽVALGOSMême sujetDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationTravaux en français237 207