MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417524778 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf1012

Childhood-onset RASopathy-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, diastolic dysfunction, and arrhythmias

2025· article· en· W4417524778 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Olga Boleti, Sotirios Roussos, Emanuele Monda, Gabrielle Norrish, Ella Field, Elena Cervi, Athanasios Bakalakos, Precylia Fernandes, Karen McLeod, Maria Ilina, Bernadette Khodaghalian, Caroline B. Jones, Fuensanta Escudero, Muzaffar Ali, Tara Bharucha, Gauri Nepali, Vinay Bhole, Grazia Delle Donne, Elspeth Brown, Juan R. Gimeno, Perry Elliott, Cordula M. Wolf, Giuseppe Limongelli, Juan Pablo Kaski

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMedical Research Council CanadaMedical Research CouncilAlexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation
Mots-clésDiastoleSystoleElectrocardiographyBlood pressureAtrial fibrillationHypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Serial data of an international cohort of 201 children with RASopathy-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Progressive left atrial enlargement, diastolic dysfunction, stable left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular outflow tract gradient, improvement in right ventricular outflow tract gradient A fifth of patients followed up into adulthood developed complex atrial arrhythmias in early adulthood. New York Heart Association/Ross functional Class >I was a time-independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events. The RASopathies account for ∼18%1 of childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cases and up to 42%2 of infantile (<1 year of age) presentations, making them the second commonest cause of paediatric HCM.1 RASopathy-associated HCM (RAS-HCM) differs clinically3,4 from sarcomeric HCM, with almost 60% first-year mortality.2,5 Small reports have suggested spontaneous regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) in up to 17% and progression in 34%.3 Whether this reflects true remodelling or relative changes during growth is unclear. This study describes long-term phenotype changes in a large multicentre childhood-onset RAS-HCM cohort. Retrospective data from patients <18 years with HCM6 and a clinical/genetic RASopathy4,5 diagnosis from January 1985 to December 2023 were collected using a predefined data extraction tool. Exclusions were missing baseline data or <2 follow-ups. Echocardiographic assessment was performed as previously described.5 Systolic dysfunction was defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 55%, hyperdynamic function as LVEF >70% and diastolic impairment as the presence of any of: mitral valve (MV) E/A < 0.75, MV E-wave deceleration time > 240 ms, or average of lateral/septal E/e′ > 14.7 Patients were followed every 6–12 months. Outcomes are reported at baseline, 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 years. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE): sudden cardiac death (SCD) or equivalent event, hospitalization due to congestive heart failure (CHF) symptoms, or cardiac transplantation. SCD equivalent event was defined as appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, aborted cardiac arrest, or sustained ventricular tachycardia with haemodynamic compromise. Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation as appropriate and categorical variables as frequencies (percentages). Between-group comparisons utilized Mann–Whitney U test or Student’s t-test for continuous variables and χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Disease progression was assessed using mixed-effects models with random intercepts and slopes, accounting for within-subject correlation and between-centre variability. Time-to-event analyses employed Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Variables for multivariable models were selected based on clinical relevance and univariate P < .10. The final model includes all significant variables at P < .10. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 18.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Two-sided P < .05 was considered significant, without adjustment for multiple comparisons in secondary analyses. Of 217 patients, 201 met the inclusion criteria. Noonan syndrome was most prevalent (n = 155, 77.1%), and PTPN11 was the most frequent gene (n = 68, 33.8%). Median age at baseline was 1.01 years (0.35–4.62). Sixty-seven patients (33.3%) had ≥1 congenital heart defects (41% valvulopathy, 10% atrial septal defect, 7% ventricular septal defect), 49 (24.6%) presented with CHF symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA)/Ross functional Class > I], 99 (51.3%) were taking ≥1 cardiac medications, 84 (48.6%) had biventricular involvement, and 39 (28.1%) had significant LV outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Non-survivors were younger [0.3 (0.3–1.0) years vs 1.2 (0.4–5.4) years, P = .019] and smaller at baseline assessment [body surface area 0.3 m2 (0.3–0.4) vs 0.4 m2 (0.3–0.7), P = .020]. At 1-year follow-up, a higher proportion of non-survivors was symptomatic [NYHA/Ross > I n = 6 (40.0%) vs n = 15 (13.3%), P = .009] and on cardiac medication [n = 13 (86.7%) vs n = 60 (53.6%), P = .015] and had a higher LV posterior wall thickness [7.5 mm (6.0–10.2) vs 6.1 mm (4.9–9.0), P = .004]. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (3.1–12.6), during which 42 patients (18.3%) had MACE (incidence 1.401/100 patient-years) and 16 (7.0%) had a SCD or equivalent event (incidence 0.577/100 patient-years). On backwards elimination multivariable analysis, NYHA/Ross > I was an independent predictor of MACE [hazard ratio: 7.08 (95% confidence interval: 1.1–43.9) P = .035]. Among 20 patients (9.9%) followed up >18 years, 4 (20%) had an episode of complex atrial arrhythmia [paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n = 2), flutter (n = 1) or prolonged re-entrant atrial tachycardia (n = 1)] at a median age of 22.6 years (22.2–24.5), all had dilated atria, and 3 had moderate mitral regurgitation and elevated average E/e′ at the time. Overall, symptoms improved [NYHA > I 20.9% at baseline vs 15.4% at 10 years, P = .009] while medication use rose [49.4% vs 56.5%, P = .015]. Maximal LV wall thickness z-score declined [+10.3 vs +8.9 at 20 years, P = .039], and LVOT gradients [23 vs 7 mmHg, P = .019] and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) gradients [17 vs 5 mmHg, P = .001] decreased. Left atrial diameter (LAd) z-score worsened [+10.6 vs +25.7 at 20 years, P < .001] (Figure 1). Mixed-effects predicted annual LAd +1.17 (P < .001), E/e′ + .39 (P = .047), RVOT gradient −1.25 mmHg (P < .001). In a sub-analysis of the genotyped patients (n = 172, 78.9%), these findings were unchanged. Progressive changes in left atrial diameter (z-score), maximal left ventricular wall thickness (z-score), and left and right ventricular outflow tract gradients in childhood RASopathy-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with increasing age (years). Fifteen patients (7.5%) presented at baseline assessment with significant symptoms of CHF (NYHA/Ross functional Class III–IV) with a median age at baseline of 0.4 years (0.0–1.0), of whom five (33.3%) died. Non-survivors had a significantly smaller LV end-diastolic diameter z-score [−4.2 (0.1) vs −0.9 (1.0), P = .023] compared to surviving patients. The major finding in this large, multicentre study is the demonstration of progressive LA dilatation and diastolic impairment associated with complex atrial arrhythmias in early adulthood. This novel finding suggests that similar vigilance and early consideration of anticoagulation, as in adults with sarcomeric HCM,8 may be appropriate and worthy of further investigation. Another novel finding is that of CHF symptoms as a time-independent predictor of MACE in RAS-HCM. As the NYHA/Ross functional class assessment is a reproducible clinical tool, a change in functional status should prompt closer surveillance and management. Symptomatic, non-surviving neonates had significantly smaller LV cavities. This may contribute to reduced LV stroke volume, leading to a smaller functional reserve. If validated, this finding could guide risk stratification and early treatment, including novel agents such as mTOR and MEKi.9 Of note, none of the patients in this study had received treatment with these agents. As a retrospective study, some data—particularly genetics—were missing.5 This cohort, albeit the largest of its kind, was not sufficiently powered to allow subgroup analyses for predictors of outcome and phenotypic progression. Systemic features of the disease were not analysed. Adult and neonatal subgroups were small, limiting conclusions. Patients presenting with RAS-HCM in childhood develop progressive diastolic dysfunction and LA dilatation, resulting in complex atrial arrhythmias in early adulthood. NYHA/Ross functional Class > I is an independent predictor of MACE. Nothing to declare. The data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This work was supported by the Onassis Foundation. J.P.K. and E.F. are supported by Max’s Foundation. J.P.K. is supported by a Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Academic Research Partnership (CARP) award (MR/T024062/1). NHS-wide Health Research Authority (HRA) approval was given for collecting anonymized, non-invasive clinical data in the UK with waiver of informed consent. Local ethical committee approval was obtained for all other participating sites. Not applicable.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Heart JournalMême sujetCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesTravaux en français237 207