MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W44760578

Family Doctor Week in Canada : December 5 to 11, 2005

2005· article· en· W44760578 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cal Gutkin

Notice bibliographique

RevueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpecialtyFamily medicineMedicineHouse of CommonsHealth careGovernment (linguistics)Family doctorsValue (mathematics)NursingPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Each year, at the time of Family Medicine Forum (FMF), the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) celebrates Family Doctor Week in Canada. This opportunity allows family physicians, their patients, and other health care professionals to acknowledge family physicians’ important contribution to health and health care across the country and to express how they value their relationships with one another. For family doctors, the discipline and practice of the specialty of family medicine is focused on patients, who are at the centre of all we do. Our interaction with all other medical specialists and health professionals is critical to the care we provide, arrange, and coordinate. For patients, repeated polls have reaffirmed how highly Canadians value having family physicians to provide care in all settings for them and their family members. For our peers in other health disciplines, the goal of enhancing collaboration with family doctors to improve quality of and access to health care has become paramount. It is appropriate, therefore, for all Canadians to reflect on these vital relationships at least once a year. In 2004, as part of our 50th Anniversary celebrations, the College launched Family Doctor Week. Statements were read by members of all parties in the House of Commons; feature sections were developed in major English- and French-language dailies; a book, Patients First; the story of family medicine in Canada, was published; and special ceremonies were held in every province where CFPC members, government leaders, and citizens witnessed the signing of Declarations of Commitment rededicating CFPC members to the principles of family medicine and to vital doctor-patient relationships. When Family Doctor Week in Canada was originally launched, the CFPC and the federal government agreed that it would not be a one-time occurrence but would be held each year at the time of the FMF, the CFPC’s Annual Scientific Assembly and business meetings. This year, Family Doctor Week in Canada will run from December 5 through 11; FMF will take place in Vancouver, BC, from Thursday, December 8, through Sunday, December 11. This year’s theme is “Preparing for Tomorrow.” To acknowledge the contributions of family physicians and to recognize Family Doctor Week in Canada, several special initiatives and events will take place both at FMF in Vancouver and across the country. Members of all parties in the federal House of Commons and provincial legislatures will be asked to deliver statements of support. Editorials, letters, and other special feature stories will be submitted to newspapers across the country. The FMF will be cohosted by the Americas Region of WONCA (the World Organization of Family Doctors) and will welcome colleagues from the United States and the Caribbean to join us. Dr David Butler-Jones, Canada’s Medical Officer of Health, will deliver the 2005 Family Medicine Lectureship on “Emergency Preparedness—the Role of Canada’s Family Doctors” as part of the opening ceremonies at FMF. A national press conference will announce the results of a public survey and will present the CFPC’s position on the need for increased support for family doctors in several key roles they play in delivering care to the people of Canada. Canada’s Family Physicians of the Year, one from each province, will be announced with special presentations at FMF and with national and provincial press releases. The first-ever CFPC medical student scholarships will be presented at FMF to 16 recipients: one from each Canadian medical school’s class of 2006. Thirty-two medical student and family medicine resident leadership awards will be presented at FMF. An All-Members Forum to be held at FMF will include updates and encourage open dialogue on issues our members have asked us to address, such as wait times and the effect of the recent Supreme Court decision, revalidation of licensure, family physician resources, medical students’ career choices, and progress reports on four major CFPC–Health Canada projects addressing the future of family medicine in Canada (enhancing support for family physicians in their practices, roles and relationships of family doctors and other specialists, increasing the role of family medicine in the undergraduate medical school curriculum, and establishing family medicine interest groups for medical students across Canada). Several Research and Education Foundation activities to support medical students’ family medicine scholarships will take place during FMF, including a silent auction, a spare change campaign, and a fun-filled fitness Walk for the Docs of Tomorrow. The CFPC, our Chapters, and university departments of family medicine are looking forward to developing activities and messages to help celebrate Family Doctor Week in Canada. While FMF 2005 will be a key venue where many events will unfold, we hope that the spirit of Family Doctor Week will spread far beyond the walls of the Vancouver Convention and Exhibition Centre. We hope this will become an annual opportunity for family physicians to celebrate the joys and rewards that accompany the privilege of caring for their patients over time and for the people of this nation to pause and reflect on the value of the relationships they have with their family doctors.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,069
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,346

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,001
Communication savante0,0060,001
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0690,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,318
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Même sujetPrimary Care and Health OutcomesTravaux en français237 207