Indigenous Peoples and the Modern State/Self Determination: The Other Path for Native Americans
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Champagne, D., K. Torjesen & S. Steiner (Eds.). Indigenous Peoples and Modem State, Toronto, Alta Mira Press, 2005. pp. 172. ISBN 978-0759-1079-91. $26.95. Anderson, T., B. Benson & T. Flanagan (Eds.) Self Determination: The Other Path for Native Americans. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006. pp. 346. ISBN 978-0804-754415. $35.00. These two publications represent bi-polar conceptualizations about Aboriginal people in North America. How such different views of Aboriginal life emerge reflects both disciplines and literature read by contributing authors. The contributors in Indigenous Peoples and Modern State have, without exception, read extensively in history and legal aspects of Aboriginal studies and engaged in field research focusing on Aboriginal issues for most of their academic careers in disciplines such as anthropology, sociology, and history. On other hand, contributors to Self Determination: The Other Path for Native Americans represent scholars from fields of economics, law, and business who have engaged in a narrow review of Aboriginal issues. There is little overlap in list of citations between two texts, confirming that two sets of authors had drawn their ideas from vastly different sources. Indigenous Peoples is comparative in that it presents material from Canadian, American, and Mexican perspectives on various issues facing Aboriginal people. The material also reflects a trans-disciplinary approach by authors as they tackle issues such as sovereignty, Indigenous knowledge, Indigenous identity, culture and economics, language and education. The issue of colonization trauma is foremost on minds of these authors as they couch their explanations within that historical context. The emergence of a stateless Indigenous identity and community looms large in their view of poverty and marginalization exhibited by Aboriginal people. The emerging Indigenous leadership and entrepreneurial activities of Aboriginal people are well documented. Other economic, justice and legal issues also are dealt with. The authors note that national narrative in each country presumes an ever receding frontier in which, as one author put it, the 'wild and primitive' were replaced by 'tame and civilized.' These narratives are as deeply embedded in academy as in North American popular culture. In short, these Grand Narratives are those that all of us learned in grade school and continue to be ones most people know, and that unfortunately tell only one side of story. Until bridges are built between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal communities, dominant national narratives will continue to construct an exclusively heroic European settler profile and an ideology that continues to insist that Aboriginal people must come to resemble them. The latter portion of book is devoted to a discussion of Mexican Aboriginal experience in a section titled Trilateral Discussion: Canada, United States and Mexico. Mexican scholars discuss how Indigenous people of Mexico focus on role of United Nations as a counter to biopiracy of other nations and transnational corporations. Language issues are crucial to Mexican Indigenous people as well as environmental pollution, loss of forests, and destruction of Indigenous social and community organizations. Policy analyses carried out in each region reveal how Indigenous people are impacted by very different policies. In end, material provides innovative and substantive materials related to enhancing our understanding of Aboriginal people and their role in these three nation states. The formal papers are carefully crafted, well-organized and presented. Unfortunately, in between sections of book, editors included short dialogues amongst contributors. These were not edited and as a result can have major errors. For example, Lubicon Indians are mistakenly located in Ontario rather than in Alberta. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».