MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W50695218 · doi:10.1155/2013/248397

Overwhelming Sepsis after a Cat Bite

2013· article· en· W50695218 sur OpenAlexaff
Julie Blackburn, Émilie Tremblay, Catherine Tsimiklis, Benoît Thivierge, Valéry Lavergne

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueRabies epidemiology and control
Établissements canadiensHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineChillsSeptic shockCellulitisPast medical historySepsisChest radiographSurgeryIntensive care unitInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In mid-June, a 52-year-old man presented to the emergency department with fever, chills and a rapidly progressing erythema on his right hand without regional lymphadenopathy, a few days after being bitten by his domestic cat. The patient resided in a rural area and had a history of chronic alcohol consumption. The cat lived primarily outdoors and its immunization status was unknown. Pasteurella multocida cellulitis was suspected, oral amoxicillin-clavulanate was prescribed and the patient was discharged. Three days later, the cellulitis regressed completely but the patient sought medical attention for persisting fever and new-onset jaundice and dyspnea. On physical examination, he was hypotensive, exhibited hepatosplenomegaly and presented a centimetric necrotic ulcer on his right hand. The patient’s hematological results revealed leukopenia, thrombopenia and an elevated international normalized ratio. His biochemistry results revealed acute renal and liver failure. His chest radiograph was normal. The patient’s condition rapidly deteriorated to septic shock and multiple organ failure. He required mechanical ventilation, vasopressive support and renal replacement therapy. Intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin were empirically started; he was transferred to a tertiary care hospital the next day. On arrival to the intensive care unit, a septic workup was repeated and the patient’s hand ulcer was surgically debrided and tissue was sent for culture. Antibiotic treatment was switched to intravenous meropenem and vancomycin for sepsis of unknown origin. The patient developed further ascites. A percutaneous cholecystostomy was performed for suspected acalculous cholecystitis. The bile and the cloudy ascitic fluid were also cultured. Despite aggressive medical therapy, the patient’s condition failed to improve during the following two days and the family decided not to further pursue active treatments. At the time of the patient’s death, viral hepatitis serology and all bacterial cultures were negative. The following day, the aerobic blood cultures showed small Gramnegative coccobacilli. What is the diagnosis? DIAGNOSIS After four days of incubation, the plates of aerobic blood cultures grew small grey colonies on chocolate agar and on initial sheep blood agar. The same isolate was identified in all other specimens (necrotic ulcer, bile, ascites and endotracheal secretion). Laboratory technicians were instructed to handle the plates inside the biosafety cabinet because Francisella tularensis was suspected. The Gram stain of the colonies showed the same tiny Gram-negative coccobacilli. The organism was tetramethyl-oxidase negative, weakly catalase positive and nonmotile. The isolate was sent to the provincial reference laboratory, which confirmed the identification of F tularensis. Following the postmortem diagnosis, an investigation headed by the regional public health agency revealed that the cat was still in good health and its serology for F tularensis was negative. Other domestic and wild animals in the area also tested negative. There were no other cases of tularemia reported in the region during the rest of the summer. Nevertheless, informational pamphlets on tularemia were distributed to local small game hunters and warnings were published in regional newspapers to increase public awareness. DISCUSSION

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,363
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,199
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical MicrobiologyMême sujetRabies epidemiology and controlTravaux en français237 207