MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W51505462

Cross-Cultural Learning in Adult Continuing Education.

2004· article· en· W51505462 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducation Canada · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAdult and Continuing Education Topics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublic relationsMulticulturalismLiberal arts educationCultural diversitySociologyThe artsImmigrationCultural competencePolitical sciencePedagogyHigher educationEnvironmental ethicsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Continuing education offers one of the most convenient and accessible ways to bring people from diverse backgrounds together for the purpose of learning. Ironically, courses that directly address cross-cultural exchange are not easily found among program offerings. Recent world and local events have made it increasingly important for Canadians to understand cultural difference. Immigration has been steadily rising due, in part, to the global perception of Canada as a model, pluralistic country. As such, Canadians may enjoy the respect of other nations, but they also have a responsibility to ensure that people from different cultures can, in fact, live together and thrive. What many believe is required now, and what Canada (as a pioneer of modern multiculturalism) is well poised for, is an increase in meaningful cross-cultural dialogue that goes beyond superficially acknowledging cultural difference to encouraging a deeper understanding of different cultural values and traditions. This kind of engagement can occur through various discussions and activities at all levels of education. However, one of the most effective ways to facilitate meaningful cross-cultural exchange is by offering liberal arts and other programs that focus on culture through continuing education. The liberal arts (subjects such as history, philosophy, literature and language) offer numerous opportunities for students to explore people and societies and reflect upon their own beliefs and values. It is, in many ways, natural for such courses to be delivered through continuing education, where, arguably, the widest range of people from the general public choose to meet and engage in dialogue. While other educational providers either offer compulsory training or cater to specific, demographic groups, continuing education provides relatively low-cost, optional and accessible learning programs that are open to virtually any member of the community. Where liberal arts and other culturally-focused programs are included among course offerings, the potential for continuing education to promote cross-cultural learning is great. WHY SHOULD CROSS-CULTURAL LEARNING BE ENCOURAGED IN CONTINUING EDUCATION? Current realities in adult continuing education reflect a focus on job-ready skills development. According to the 1998 Adult Education and Training Survey, published by Statistics Canada, 28% of Canadians participated in adult education and training programs in 1997. Of these, three of every four did so for job-related purposes. The highest demand for courses was in applied fields such as business, education, health, engineering and computer science. This data suggests that the “applied” fields listed above are considered to be “jobrelated”, while other fields such as the liberal arts and cultural studies are not generally considered to be applicable to the workplace. There is much literature, however, suggesting the opposite: that in fact, the liberal arts (which facilitate engagement with questions about culture) are very relevant to our professional lives. For instance, in a 1986 working paper, Dr. William O’Brian, American educator and president of an educational Cross-Cultural Learning in Adult Continuing Education

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,701
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle