MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W5208857

Стачечные выступления рабочих в Сибири в начале нового революционного подъема (июнь 1910 апрель 1912 г. )

2012· article· ru· W5208857 sur OpenAlex
Толочко Анатолий Павлович

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueВестник Томского государственного университета. История · 2012
Typearticle
Langueru
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProletariatPoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)General strikeWorking classHistoryEconomic historyPolitical scienceLawArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The article points out that of all the diversity of labour movement strike was the most specific proletarian form of struggle. Growth of strike struggle of the Russian proletariat in the second half of 1910 was the main indicator of the beginning of a new labour movement rise in the country after a three-year period of the political reaction from 1907 to the first half of 1910. Revival of the workers' class activity in Russia in the second half of 1920 did not mean deep quantity and quality changes in the strike struggle. In the mentioned year out of 78 thousand strikers only 6 thousand ones took part in political strikes, the rest took part in economic turns. As in the years of reaction, strikes bore mainly self-defensive character, where most of them ended up in defeat. So, labour movement rise in 1910 came very slowly. Especially it referred in the early months of the rise to workers from the remote places, in particular, from Siberia. Strike movement here revealed the tendency to its growth only in 1911 when its scale and structure changed significantly. Thus, in 1911in Siberia there took place 63 strikes with approximately 7377 workers participating, whereas the year before there were 52 strikes with 3800 workers participating. In the first quarter of 1912 (before shooting of workers in Lenskygold-mines) workers' struggle continued to grow. From January to April this year Siberian workers held 62 strikes in which participated around 6900 people. Unlike the central regions of the country, in Siberia the revival of the proletarian struggle in the early years of the rise was not followed by political turns of the local workers. Only at the beginning of 1912 here was seen the increase of strikes with mixed demands. Alongside with that strikes gained offensive character more and more. However, offensive turns became clearly dominant in Siberia only in the first quarter of 1912, whereas in the central provinces it happened since the early 1911. Quantitative growth of strikes in Siberia in 1911 the early 1912, the increase of offensive and successful strikes were closely connected with changes in the participants body of the strike struggle in the period under review. If in 1910 in strike movement there dominated builders, with miners following up, in 1911 the early 1912 the situation changed significantly. Miners were considerably ahead builders in the degree of participation in the movement. Alongside with them during that period workers of processing industry began to participate in strikes more actively. In 1911, in particular, they held 19 strikes (i.e. 2.4 times more than in 1910). The development of strike movement in Siberia during the first years of the rise became quite a significant factor in the social life of the region. Together with the rise of the labour movement the social-democratic underground activated, which manifested in in its attempts to become a leading element in the strikes. In 1911-1912 social democrats led strikes in the main workshops in Chita (January, 1911), at the shipyard of the Kushnarevs' trading house in Verholensk district of the Irkutsk province (January 1911), at Bekkera's brickyard in Krasnoyarsk (June 1911), in Lensk gold-mine (the early 1912). However, many turns in the early years of the period under review took place without the influence and leadership of social democrats. Thus, the analysis of the strike movement in Siberia at the beginning of the new revolutionary rise (June 1910 the early 1912) let us say that like in other regions of the country it did not spread broadly and grew gradually after hard years of political reaction. However, the tendency of the rise was significant in Siberian margin as well. The number of strikes and number of its participants grew, and qualitative changes were observed in strike movement. It became especially apparent at a later stage of the struggle from 1912 to 1914.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,409
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0040,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,003
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,005
Communication savante0,0020,006
Science ouverte0,0060,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0250,039

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle