MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W53840444

Introduction: The Peri-Urban Zone: The Structure and Dynamics of a Strategic Component of Metropolitan regions/Introduction: La Zone Periurbaine: Structure et Dynamiques D'une Composante Strategique Des Regions Metropolitaines

2003· article· en· W53840444 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Regional Science · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueFrench Urban and Social Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMetropolitan areaRegional scienceGeographyContext (archaeology)Human settlementEconomic geographyUrban planningUrban structureEnvironmental planningRural areaUrban spatial structureRegional planningCivil engineeringPolitical scienceEngineeringArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction * The rural-urban fringe, increasingly replaced in the research terminology by peri-urban fringes, zones or areas, has been a major arena for geographic research, and to a lesser extent, research in the planning field, for over 50 years. From the 1970s in particular, considerable research was undertaken on this zone, focusing on the patterns of change in the context of the then dominant conceptual framework, that of the central city and built-up area, the rural-urban fringe, the outer fringe and the urban shadow. Such research became very popular in Canada, for instance, during and after the 1970s when it was recognized that this zone was a central part of the structure and functioning of urban and metropolitan regional systems. These zones represented and still represent important extensions of the living space of major urban and metropolitan systems--as living environments, as environments in which employment opportunities were developed and resources exploited (e.g. agricultural resources), as environments in which important recreational and leisure activities could be pursued and provided for, and as environments destined to receive many important infrastructural developments (e.g. transportation infrastructure). The regional metropolitan system comprises: the urban area (central parts plus the suburbs); the peri-urban zone, with its mixture of settlements, countryside and natural spaces; and the rural hinterland. In one form or another, this simple zone-like structure has been used to describe the structure of regional urban and metropolitan systems for over 50 years. Increasingly, however, while the zone-like structure is still used as a point of departure and still represents a way of conceptualizing the results of the operation of meso scale urbanization forces on land use activities and development generally around major cities, the last 15 years have seen more and more attention paid to other aspects of the patterns and dynamics around cities, including radial patterns and, more generally, the development of a mosaic of structures and dynamics. Whatever the specific spatial form of the regional metropolitan system, all of the geographic spaces within it are tied together into a functioning social and economic system. Sometimes, these regional metropolitan systems are recognized through some form of administrative structure and the geographic limits of the regional administrative structure defines the arena of more or less concerted public intervention in terms of the planning and management of change. Frequently, however, the real social and functioning regional metropolitan system extends beyond these geographic limits, creating various tensions and stresses. The French Ile-de-France region based on Paris provides an excellent example of this, as do the structures that are based on Montreal, Vancouver and Toronto in Canada. Structures and Dynamics Beyond the Suburbs: The Special Issue The focus in this special issue of the Canadian Journal of Regional Science is on the peri-urban spaces of several Canadian and French metropolitan areas, as well as drawing upon research from the Paris team on the Tokyo area. The articles thus deal with various aspects of the structure and dynamics of those parts of the regional metropolitan system beyond the central agglomeration (the urban area proper). However, as is clear in several of the papers, and as we emphasize, it is imperative that the overall regional structure and system perspective be maintained, both in terms of the interrelationships between the dynamics of the different areas (e.g. the property market in the peri-urban fringe is linked to processes affecting the property market in the central agglomeration) and in terms of governance and planning of the different component geographic parts. The intent is not to cover all of the different types of research that are being conducted on the peri-urban zone, but to illustrate the structures and dynamics in this zone that are the subject of research in the two sponsoring research units, to which has been added analyses from colleagues in other universities in the two countries, Canada and France. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,559
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,017
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle