MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W55454765

Outsourcing, Offshoring, Nearshoring: What to Do? Whether You Outsource Locally or Globally, You're Still Responsible for Client Privacy

2005· article· en· W55454765 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gary S. Shamis, M. Cathryn Green, Susan M. Sorensen, Donald L. Kyle

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOutsourcingBusinessOffshoringService providerLiabilityConsolidation (business)Valuation (finance)Service (business)MarketingFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * FANS OF OFFSHORE OUTSOURCING SAY it lowers labor costs; it's efficient; and it lets firms accept new work during periods of peak demand. * SOME LONG-TERM CONCERNS CPAs VOICE ARE: How will outsourcing affect the traditional CPA career path? How will it affect U.S. employees' training? How will accountants who do not perform the tasks associated with entry-level competencies develop true understanding of the services they provide? * FIRMS MUST DISCLOSE THEIR USE of third-party vendors to clients whether the outsource provider is located within U.S. borders or in a foreign country. * PROPONENTS SAY THE PROCESS IS MORE efficient, though firms lose the efficiency that develops when the same in-house staff members service a client from year to year. * OUTSOURCERS OFTEN USE FIREWALLS that are more secure than those used by many U.S. firms. But focus-group participants said they were uneasy about having their personal information sent 7,000 miles away. * BEFORE CONTRACTING WITH A PROVIDER, ask how it screens and monitors employees, how a system breach will be handled, where disputes will be resolved and what the firm's liability insurance covers. If there's a problem, liability will rest with the U.S. firm. ********** New ideas and services can change a business culture with astonishing speed. A generation ago few CPA firms offered business valuation, litigation support or retirement planning, yet those services are mainstream today. Equally common are formerly cutting-edge ideas such as flextime, cross-selling and firm consolidation. Now, as technology makes it easy to move data great distances, another innovation has its foot in the door. It's tax-preparation and financial-services outsourcing--called offshoring when the work is done overseas and nearshoring if it's done in Canada or Mexico. This article describes some pros and cons of business process outsourcing (BPO)--with the emphasis on work done out of the country-and suggests how interested firms of all sizes can research whether it's right for them. WHAT IS TAX OUTSOURCING? The tax-preparation outsourcing process is simple. A CPA firm staff member scans client documents, including W-2s, 1099s and K-1s, into a .pdffile saved in the network, then sends along the prior-year tax file to the outsource provider. The provider, in or outside the United States, then uploads all scanned documents and relevant tax files to a U.S. data center. Outsource workers access the documents via a Web browser, organize them into a Web-based file and prepare the returns. If the provider happens to be in India, chartered accountants using the U.S. firm's preferred tax software follow the same procedures and prepare the returns. Then the firm picks up the returns electronically and reviews and corrects them as needed. WHAT ARE THE GOOD POINTS? Proponents of tax outsourcing cite these virtues: It's efficient. Outsourcing provides seasonal labor without the overhead of permanent hires, which is particularly helpful to firms dealing with a staff shortage. Firms with enough people to handle busy season but that worry about a glut of unused hours the rest of the year may see a benefit, too. Indian providers, who are at work while U.S. workers are sleeping, may offer two- to three-day turnarounds during crunch time, quicker than most firms can deliver internally. Fred Shapss, CPA, partner at Rosen, Seymour, Shapss, Martin (RSSM) & Co., New York, says his firm has found tax offshoring helps relieve busy season overload. The firm outsourced about 150 of its 2003 individual returns to India and upped that number to about 600 returns (out of about 4,000) for 2004. It's a straightforward operation with no complexities he says. We get a 48-hour turnaround. But--like anything else--you have to monitor and manage the process. It lets firms handle more work. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,589
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0040,009
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations17
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancyMême sujetOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementTravaux en français237 207