MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W56684479 · doi:10.1093/pch/18.1.e1

Efficacy of glutamine supplementation on the outcome of children admitted with persistent diarrhea in Uganda: A randomized controlled study

2013· article· en· W56684479 sur OpenAlexaff
Justine M. Kamuchaki, Eric Wobudeya, Sarah Kiguli, Robert Bortolussi

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNursing
ThématiqueClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Établissements canadiensCanadian Child Health Clinician Scientist ProgramDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDiarrheaRandomized controlled trialPediatricsGlutamineOutcome (game theory)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Developing countries have 25% of the global disease burden but only 1.3% of the health care professionals. While donor research focuses on important diagnostic and treatment advances, efforts to build local community-focused research capacity have been limited. Training and support for community-based research is needed to address, with evidence, context-specific local problems that can lead to improved health outcomes – a must if Africa is to achieve the Millennium Goals of decreasing maternal mortality rates as well as those of children under five years of age. East Africa has bright young university health faculty who know the local health problems and understand the context but lack research skills and resources to address them. The Canadian Paediatric Society is concerned about child health globally. MicroResearch (MR), sponsored in part by the Canadian Paediatric Society, provides capacity building in community-based research through training, small grants and coaching from Canadian research experts who support eager interdisciplinary MR teams at five sites in East Africa with their local maternal/child health questions. All projects are aimed at improving health outcomes. The present MR brief report summarizes the findings from one MR project that evaluated the efficacy of oral glutamine supplementation in children with persistent diarrhea in Kampala, Uganda. The full project report can be found at www.microresearch.ca. Noni E MacDonald, Editor-in-chief, Paediatrics & Child Health Diarrheal diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children in the developing world, responsible for one billion episodes of illness and 1.6 million to 2.5 million deaths annually. Persistent diarrhea contributes to approximately one-half of the total diarrhea-related deaths, although only approximately 3% to 20% of acute diarrheal episodes become persistent. Several factors including prolonged intestinal injury, increased intestinal permeability, delayed intestinal regeneration and translocation of bacteria into the blood stream, may account for this high mortality. Glutamine, a nonessential amino acid, improves intestinal mucosal regeneration, decreases intestinal permeability and improves intestinal absorption. Glutamine supplementation has been shown to improve diarrhea secondary to nelfinavir and chemotherapy in adults. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of oral glutamine supplementation in children two to 60 months of age with persistent diarrhea in Kampala, Uganda. The present study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial involving children admitted to Mulago Hospital (Kampala, Uganda) with persistent diarrhea. Persistent diarrhea was defined as diarrhea that began acutely and lasted >14 days. Children two to 60 months of age whose parents or caregivers provided consent were included in the study, and children with underlying renal or liver disease or those who were documented to have received antimotility medications during the current illness were excluded. The eligible children were block randomized in a 1 to 1 ratio to receive either standard treatment alone or standard treatment with glutamine supplementation. Glutamine was administered according to weight bands; children weighing 5 kg to 12.5 kg and 12.6 kg to 20 kg to received 1.5 g and 2 g every 12 h, respectively. Children were assessed every 6 h for the first 24 h then twice per day thereafter by a research assistant for the number of diarrhea stools, vomiting, hydration status and fever. The study participants were followed up to a maximum of 12 days. The primary outcome measure was cessation of diarrhea. Cessation of diarrhea was defined as <3 watery or loose stools per 24 h over a 72 h period of follow-up. The present study and consent form were approved by the School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee at Makerere University College of health sciences (Kampala, Uganda). From October 2011 to March 2012, 138 children were enrolled with 69 in each group. The baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups with an equal median follow-up time of five days (interquartile range = 3 days). Two patients in each group were lost to follow up. The median duration of diarrhea in the two groups was the same (four days in the glutamine group versus three days in the standard group; P=0.84). The proportion of children with cessation of diarrhea was 79.7% in the glutamine group and 87% in the standard treatment group (RR 0.5 [95% CI 0.2 to 1.4]; P=0.25). Three deaths occurred in the glutamine group and one death occurred in the standard treatment group. All the deaths were determined to be unrelated to the study product by the Data Safety Monitoring Board. Glutamine supplementation showed no benefit on the outcome of persistent diarrhea in admitted children two to 60 months of age.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,003
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyTravaux en français237 207